code-reviewer
Review code for best practices, security, performance, and potential issues. Use when reviewing code, checking pull requests, analysing code quality, or when asked to critique implementation.
Discover blockchain code quality skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Review code for best practices, security, performance, and potential issues. Use when reviewing code, checking pull requests, analysing code quality, or when asked to critique implementation.
Autonomous code review for best practices, security, performance, and potential issues. Runs in isolation with read-only tools using Opus model. Use when reviewing code, checking PRs, or analysing code quality.
Enforces functional programming, immutability, and strict type safety when writing, reviewing, or editing TypeScript and React code.
Enforces ventilated prose and concise technical writing standards when the user is writing or editing standalone documentation files (e.g., Markdown, AsciiDoc). This skill should not be used for code documentat...
Reviews code and suggests improvements. Use when asked to review code or propose refactors.
Parallel lint fixing pattern - runs lint checks, groups issues into independent streams, and dispatches AI agents to fix all issues until the codebase is clean.
Analyzes codebase against standards and generates refactoring tasks for ring:dev-cycle.
Validate plugin integrity and offer safe auto-fixes for common issues - checks agents, skills, hooks, routing config, and plugin structure
Validates PopKit code quality using concrete metrics for DRY, coupling, cohesion, and architectural patterns
Confidence-based code review that filters issues to 80+ threshold, eliminating false positives and noise. Reviews implementation against plan or requirements for bugs, quality issues, and project conventions. U...
Validates PopKit compliance with Claude Code patterns using concrete standards and automated checks
Perform thorough code reviews with focus on security, performance, maintainability, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, pull requests, entire files, or codebase audits across any programming la...
Use when configuring ESLint - covers flat config, TypeScript integration, and custom rules
Use when writing TypeScript with strict mode - covers type definitions, generics, and declaration files
Use when working with docusaurus.config.js/ts files to validate or modify Docusaurus configuration
Auto-review Go code for 100+ common mistakes when analyzing .go files, discussing Go patterns, or reviewing PRs with Go code. Checks error handling, concurrency, interfaces, performance, testing, and stdlib usa...
Comprehensive Rust development guidelines based on 6 months of code reviews. Use when writing Rust code, debugging Rust issues, or reviewing Rust PRs. Covers error handling, file I/O safety, type safety pattern...
Ensures code quality through reviews, refactoring, technical debt management, and clean code practices
Identify code smells, prioritize refactoring opportunities, and assess technical debt impact
Apply comprehensive code review checklist covering purpose, design, quality, correctness, security, performance, testing, and documentation. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code reviews, or self-re...
Apply code quality standards for testing, coverage, CI/CD, and automation: Vitest, coverage philosophy, git hooks, GitHub Actions, quality gates. Use when setting up testing, configuring CI, discussing quality...
Validate UI components for WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance. Use when checking accessibility, color contrast, keyboard navigation, screen reader support, or ARIA attributes.
Code quality validation with linters, SOLID principles, error detection, and architecture compliance across all languages.
Code reviewer providing objective quality metrics, security analysis, and actionable feedback. Use for code reviews with scoring, linting, type checking, and duplication detection.
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.