documenting-code-comments
Standards for writing self-documenting code and best practices for when to write (and avoid) code comments. Use when auditing, cleaning up, or improving inline code documentation.
Discover blockchain code quality skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Standards for writing self-documenting code and best practices for when to write (and avoid) code comments. Use when auditing, cleaning up, or improving inline code documentation.
Automatically apply standard coding conventions when writing or modifying code. Use this skill when working with Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, PHP, or creating git commits. Triggers include writing new co...
Review code for best practices, security issues, and potential bugs. Use when reviewing code changes, checking PRs, analyzing code quality, or performing security audits.
Copilot agent that assists with comprehensive code review focusing on code quality, SOLID principles, security, performance, and best practices Trigger terms: code review, review code, code quality, best pract...
Use this skill when reviewing pull requests, branch changes, or code diffs. Triggers on "review this PR", "review my changes", "code review", "review branch", or when user shares a GitHub PR URL.
Use this skill when the user provides a code snippet and wants a quick quality analysis, statistics, or readability score.
PRに付いたレビューコメントを確認し、修正対応を実行する。「レビューコメント確認」「レビュー対応」「PRコメント確認」「レビュー修正」などで起動。
Go コードをレビューする。「コードレビューして」「Go のレビュー」「レビューお願い」「コード確認」「品質チェック」「ベストプラクティス確認」「改善点を教えて」などで起動。
Go コードの静的解析を実行する。「lint して」「静的解析」「golangci-lint」「コードチェック」「lint 実行」「警告を確認」「lint エラー確認」などで起動。
自分の PR に付いたレビューコメントを確認し、修正対応を実行する(PR作成者向け)。「レビュー対応」「レビューコメント確認」「指摘を修正」「PRコメント確認」などで起動。
Go のエラーを診断し修正する。「エラーを直して」「ビルドエラー修正」「コンパイルエラー」「Go のエラー修正」「ビルドが通らない」「テストが失敗」「lint エラー修正」などで起動。
Codex CLIが利用可能な場合、Codex CLI(read-only)を用いて、レビュー→Claude Code修正→再レビュー(ok: true まで)を反復し収束させるレビューゲート。仕様書/SPEC/PRD/要件定義/設計、実装計画(PLANS.md等)の作成・更新...
Comprehensive TypeScript engineering guidelines based on Google's TypeScript Style Guide. This skill should be used when writing TypeScript code, performing TypeScript code reviews, or answering questions about...
Go code review skill synthesized from 4,100+ PR review comments spanning 4.5 years from the tetrateio/tetrate repository. Use this skill when reviewing Go code, providing code review feedback, or understanding...
Comprehensive Python engineering guidelines for writing production-quality Python code. This skill should be used when writing Python code, performing Python code reviews, working with Python tools (uv, ruff, m...
Comprehensive shell/bash engineering guidelines based on Google's Shell Style Guide. This skill should be used when writing shell scripts, reviewing bash code, or answering questions about shell scripting best...
Author or update Locque .lq code and tests with the canonical M-expr syntax, CBPV rules, data/match forms, modules/imports/opens, and project conventions.
Proactively detect and execute code refactoring to maintain DDD architecture and code quality. Triggers: RF, refactor, 重構, 拆分, split, 模組化, modularize, 太長, cleanup, 整理, 優化, optimize, 抽出, extract,...
程式碼審查。觸發:review、審查、檢查、看一下、有沒有問題、安全。
Generate comprehensive test suites, identify coverage gaps, and accelerate progress toward 70% test coverage goal with intelligent test recommendations
Analyze design system usage, identify inconsistencies across patterns, generate fixes, and maintain visual coherence with automated style guide generation
Enforce code standards, validate against project patterns, review code quality, and maintain consistent TypeScript strict mode compliance across all components
Code reviewer focusing on correctness, regressions, security, and test coverage - P0/P1/P2 severity
Validates research/plan/code against overengineering, underengineering, and hallucination
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.