code-review
Skill para revisar codigo com checklist de qualidade
Discover blockchain code quality skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Skill para revisar codigo com checklist de qualidade
Detect and configure quality gate commands for Ralph's autonomous execution. Use when: (1) Analyzing a project to determine available test, lint, and build scripts, (2) Generatiing a task-specific verification...
Fix Python code formatting issues using the Ruff formatter. Use when: (1) Formatting errors are detected by ruff format --check, (2) Python files need to be formatted to match project style, (3) Pre-commit hook...
Add a new code quality check to CI, justfile, and pre-commit hooks. Use when adding linters, formatters, type checkers, or other code quality tools to the project.
Structures actionable improvement recommendations to transform code from current state to 10/10 quality. Use when creating improvement plans, prioritizing technical debt, building remediation roadmaps, or after...
Fixes naming convention issues including unused variables, single-letter names, and non-standard abbreviations. Use when encountering no-unused-vars errors or reviewing variable naming.
Detects code smells, anti-patterns, and common bugs with quantified thresholds and severity scoring. Use when reviewing code quality, finding maintainability issues, detecting SOLID violations, or identifying t...
Provides the complete code review scoring rubric with 10 weighted categories, severity multipliers, and deduction calculations. Use when performing quantified code reviews, calculating quality scores, or creati...
Identifies, categorizes, and articulates code issues with brutal honesty and quantifiable specificity. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, performing code audits, or when user needs direct assessment o...
Analyzes codebases to map architecture, dependencies, complexity metrics, and data flows for rapid onboarding. Use when exploring new repos, understanding project layout, analyzing dependencies, measuring code...
Audits code for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility, complexity metrics, and infrastructure security. Use when reviewing code quality, performing security audits, checking OWASP complian...
Fixes error handling issues including floating promises, silent catches, and throwing non-Error objects. Use when encountering @typescript-eslint/no-floating-promises, silent catch blocks, or throw statement is...
Fixes import statement ordering and organization issues. Use when encountering import-x/order errors or when imports are disorganized. Auto-fixable with ESLint.
Provides quantitative rubrics and criteria for scoring code quality on a 1-10 scale. Use when reviewing code, performing code audits, establishing quality baselines, comparing implementations, or providing obje...
Comprehensive codebase review and parallel agent-based remediation skill. Use PROACTIVELY when agent needs to perform full codebase audit, generate master findings report with quantified metrics, and execute re...
Fixes TypeScript type safety issues including unsafe member access, assignments, returns, calls, and arguments. Use when encountering @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-* errors or when working with unknown/any types...
Identifies code smells, applies design patterns, guides migrations, and performs security/performance/accessibility refactoring. Use when improving code quality, modernizing codebases, applying design patterns,...
Evaluates codebase architecture for patterns, anti-patterns, coupling, cohesion, scalability, and technical debt. Use when assessing system design, reviewing architecture decisions, identifying improvement area...
Review Rust code for idiomatic patterns, best practices, and production quality. Use when reviewing Rust crates, checking code quality, or before committing Rust changes.
Enforce code style and formatting preferences. Use when writing or reviewing code to ensure consistent style.
Review code for Effect-TS patterns, common issues, and project conventions. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code quality, or before committing changes.
Run code hygiene checks before committing. Use before git commits or when asked to check code quality.
Detect and simplify overly complex code. Apply KISS principle - less is more.
Comprehensive code review with multi-agent analysis. Checks security, performance, maintainability, tests.
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.