evaluation-rubrics
Use when need explicit quality criteria and scoring scales to evaluate work consistently, compare alternatives objectively, set acceptance thresholds, reduce subjective bias, or when user mentions rubric, scori...
Browse published AI skills maintained by lyndonkl. Compare skill descriptions and follow each source repository for setup instructions.
Indexed skills
77Repository stars across indexed skills
2,310Repository forks
231Average repository stars per indexed skill
30Repository stars may repeat across skills from the same repository.
Use when need explicit quality criteria and scoring scales to evaluate work consistently, compare alternatives objectively, set acceptance thresholds, reduce subjective bias, or when user mentions rubric, scori...
Use when documenting significant technical or architectural decisions that need context, rationale, and consequences recorded. Invoke when choosing between technology options, making infrastructure decisions, e...
Use to convert probabilities into decisions (bet/pass/hedge) and optimize scoring. Invoke when need to calculate edge, size bets optimally (Kelly Criterion), extremize aggregated forecasts, or improve Brier sco...
Use when problems involve interconnected components with feedback loops (reinforcing or balancing), delays, or emergent behavior where simple cause-effect thinking fails. Invoke when identifying leverage points...
Use when writing or reviewing NIH, NSF, or foundation grant proposals. Invoke when user mentions specific aims, R01, R21, K-series, significance, innovation, approach section, grant writing, proposal review, re...
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.