Discover tools academic skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Identify which standards are covered vs. missing, analyze depth of coverage for each standard, prioritize uncovered standards, and recommend content to fill gaps. Use when auditing curriculum coverage. Activate...
Use when writing CS research papers (conference, journal, thesis), reviewing scientific manuscripts, improving academic writing clarity, or preparing IEEE/ACM submissions. Invoke when user mentions paper, manus...
This skill should be used when evaluating the quality of book chapters, lessons, or educational content. It provides a systematic 6-category rubric with weighted scoring (Technical Accuracy 30%, Pedagogical Eff...
Blind peer review for code - multiple agents critique independently, then synthesize privately to avoid groupthink
Synthesizes provided sources neutrally; separates quotes from paraphrase and avoids ungrounded claims.
data-collection for evidence-based learning research and evaluation.
Evaluate student assignment reports using three independent reviewers for consensus grading. Each reviewer reads the PDF and context files independently, then provides section assessments in Swedish. Results co...
Webからの情報収集、最新の技術トレンド調査、および公開ドキュメントの分析を行う
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.