OpenClaw

prompt-rewriter

Advanced prompt rewriting and optimization service. Analyzes prompts for clarity, specificity, structure, completeness, and usability. Identifies weaknesses, suggests improvements, and generates multiple rewrite options. Use when users need to improve an existing prompt's effectiveness, understand why a prompt isn't working well, generate variations of a prompt for A/B testing, or learn prompt engineering best practices through examples.

hhhh124hhhh0 来源安装数☆ 0 仓库 Stars

查看来源 ↗安装与使用 SKILL.md ↗

安装与使用

请根据来源仓库和你的 AI 工具说明安装此技能。先阅读技能文件和依赖要求，再添加到工作流。

SkillHub CLI

skillhub install hhhh124hhhh/prompt-rewriter

打开来源仓库，查看说明和兼容环境后，按来源提供的命令或步骤安装。

将来源链接提供给你的 Agent，让它先读取说明、核对依赖，并向你说明将执行的安装步骤。

查看来源 ↗使用指南

技能说明

Prompt Rewriter

Overview

Help users transform vague, ineffective prompts into powerful, well-structured instructions that produce consistent, high-quality results from AI models. Analyzes prompts across multiple quality dimensions and provides actionable suggestions.

Quick Start

User says: "Help me rewrite this prompt: 'Write a blog post about AI'"

You should:

Analyze the original prompt's weaknesses (too vague, no audience specified, no format defined)
Identify improvement areas (add topic specificity, target audience, tone, length, structure)
Provide 2-3 rewrite options with different approaches
Explain the changes and why they matter

Core Capabilities

1. Prompt Quality Analysis

Evaluate prompts across five key dimensions:

Clarity (0-2)

Is the request unambiguous?
Are terms defined?
Can Claude understand without clarification?

Specificity (0-2)

Are constraints clear?
Is output format specified?
Are boundaries defined?

Structure (0-2)

Is information organized logically?
Are steps clear if applicable?
Is there a framework?

Completeness (0-2)

Is sufficient context provided?
Are requirements comprehensive?
Is missing information flagged?

Usability (0-2)

Is it reusable?
Can it be adapted easily?
Is the language natural?

Scoring:

8-10: Excellent prompt, minor tweaks needed
6-7: Good prompt, moderate improvements possible
4-5: Functional but has significant weaknesses
0-3: Poor prompt, needs major rework

2. Rewrite Generation

Generate 2-3 rewrite variations using different approaches:

Variation 1: Conservative Fix

Keep original intent
Add specificity and structure
Minimal stylistic changes
Best when user wants to preserve voice

Variation 2: Technique Enhancement

Apply prompt engineering patterns (CoT, few-shot, etc.)
Add advanced techniques
Focus on effectiveness
Best when user wants optimal results

**Variation 3: Simplifica...

来源信息

Source: github
Repository: openclaw/skills
Path: skills/hhhh124hhhh/prompt-rewriter
Version: —
Commit: fbd9eefdc94e14900fa19cd2e1ecf9ec8b0a91b5
分类来源: rules
状态: active
可见性: public

这些信息来自收录时的来源分析，可能滞后；使用前请核对最新来源文件。

来源内容

SKILL.md

# Prompt Rewriter

## Overview

Help users transform vague, ineffective prompts into powerful, well-structured instructions that produce consistent, high-quality results from AI models. Analyzes prompts across multiple quality dimensions and provides actionable suggestions.

## Quick Start

**User says**: "Help me rewrite this prompt: 'Write a blog post about AI'"

**You should**:
1. Analyze the original prompt's weaknesses (too vague, no audience specified, no format defined)
2. Identify improvement areas (add topic specificity, target audience, tone, length, structure)
3. Provide 2-3 rewrite options with different approaches
4. Explain the changes and why they matter

---

## Core Capabilities

### 1. Prompt Quality Analysis

Evaluate prompts across five key dimensions:

**Clarity** (0-2)
- Is the request unambiguous?
- Are terms defined?
- Can Claude understand without clarification?

**Specificity** (0-2)
- Are constraints clear?
- Is output format specified?
- Are boundaries defined?

**Structure** (0-2)
- Is information organized logically?
- Are steps clear if applicable?
- Is there a framework?

**Completeness** (0-2)
- Is sufficient context provided?
- Are requirements comprehensive?
- Is missing information flagged?

**Usability** (0-2)
- Is it reusable?
- Can it be adapted easily?
- Is the language natural?

**Scoring**:
- 8-10: Excellent prompt, minor tweaks needed
- 6-7: Good prompt, moderate improvements possible
- 4-5: Functional but has significant weaknesses
- 0-3: Poor prompt, needs major rework

### 2. Rewrite Generation

Generate 2-3 rewrite variations using different approaches:

**Variation 1: Conservative Fix**
- Keep original intent
- Add specificity and structure
- Minimal stylistic changes
- Best when user wants to preserve voice

**Variation 2: Technique Enhancement**
- Apply prompt engineering patterns (CoT, few-shot, etc.)
- Add advanced techniques
- Focus on effectiveness
- Best when user wants optimal results

**Variation 3: Simplifica...

搜索