Search

PythonReactSEOPDF
OpenClaw

pre-mortem-analyst

Imagine the project already failed, then work backward to find why. More powerful than risk assessment because it assumes failure is certain. Use when user says "pre-mortem", "premortem", "imagine this failed", "what could go wrong", "risk analysis", "before we launch", "stress test", "what would kill this", "project risks".

artyomx330 source installs☆ 0 Repository stars

Installation

Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.

SkillHub CLI

skillhub install artyomx33/pre-mortem-analyst

Inspect the source and compatibility requirements, then follow its installation steps.

Give your agent the source link and ask it to inspect instructions and dependencies before explaining the installation steps.

View source ↗Guides

Skill instructions

Pre-Mortem Analyst

Why Pre-Mortem > Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment: "What MIGHT go wrong?" → Optimism bias filters answers Pre-Mortem: "It's 6 months later. It FAILED. Why?" → Liberates honest analysis

Research: Pre-mortems increase problem identification by 30%.

The Process

  1. Set the scene: "It's [date]. This has failed completely."
  2. Brainstorm causes: List 10+ failure reasons (no filtering)
  3. Categorize: People, Process, Technology, External
  4. Rate: Likelihood × Impact (H/M/L)
  5. Prevent: Top 3 get specific mitigation actions
  6. Monitor: Define early warning signs

Output Format

PROJECT: [Name]
FAILURE SCENARIO: "It's [date]. [Project] has completely failed."

WHY IT FAILED:

👥 PEOPLE: [Cause] - L×I: H/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
⚙️ PROCESS: [Cause] - L×I: M/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
💻 TECHNOLOGY: [Cause] - L×I: L/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
🌍 EXTERNAL: [Cause] - L×I: M/M | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]

TOP 3 PRIORITIES:
1. [Risk] → [Specific action]
2. [Risk] → [Specific action]
3. [Risk] → [Specific action]

WARNING SIGNS TO MONITOR:
□ [Early indicator 1]
□ [Early indicator 2]

Common Failure Categories

Category Common Causes
People Key person leaves, skill gaps, misalignment, low buy-in
Process Aggressive timeline, scope creep, dependency issues
Tech Doesn't scale, integration fails, security breach
External Market shift, competitor move, regulation change

Integration

Compounds with:

  • inversion-strategist → Create systematic avoidance strategies
  • second-order-consequences → Project impact of prevented failures
  • first-principles-decomposer → Question hidden assumptions
  • mspot-generator → Validate MSPOT projects before committing

See references/examples.md for Artem-specific pre-mortems

Source information

Source
github
Repository
openclaw/skills
Path
skills/artyomx33/pre-mortem-analyst
Version
—
Commit
35acfa79ce48b5e41083af2534069dd67072bccd
Classification source
rules
Status
active
Visibility
public

These signals come from indexed source analysis and may lag behind changes. Check the current source files.

Extracted content

SKILL.md
# Pre-Mortem Analyst

## Why Pre-Mortem > Risk Assessment

**Risk Assessment:** "What MIGHT go wrong?" → Optimism bias filters answers
**Pre-Mortem:** "It's 6 months later. It FAILED. Why?" → Liberates honest analysis

Research: Pre-mortems increase problem identification by 30%.

## The Process

1. **Set the scene:** "It's [date]. This has failed completely."
2. **Brainstorm causes:** List 10+ failure reasons (no filtering)
3. **Categorize:** People, Process, Technology, External
4. **Rate:** Likelihood × Impact (H/M/L)
5. **Prevent:** Top 3 get specific mitigation actions
6. **Monitor:** Define early warning signs

## Output Format

```
PROJECT: [Name]
FAILURE SCENARIO: "It's [date]. [Project] has completely failed."

WHY IT FAILED:

👥 PEOPLE: [Cause] - L×I: H/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
⚙️ PROCESS: [Cause] - L×I: M/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
💻 TECHNOLOGY: [Cause] - L×I: L/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
🌍 EXTERNAL: [Cause] - L×I: M/M | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]

TOP 3 PRIORITIES:
1. [Risk] → [Specific action]
2. [Risk] → [Specific action]
3. [Risk] → [Specific action]

WARNING SIGNS TO MONITOR:
□ [Early indicator 1]
□ [Early indicator 2]
```

## Common Failure Categories

| Category | Common Causes |
|----------|---------------|
| **People** | Key person leaves, skill gaps, misalignment, low buy-in |
| **Process** | Aggressive timeline, scope creep, dependency issues |
| **Tech** | Doesn't scale, integration fails, security breach |
| **External** | Market shift, competitor move, regulation change |

## Integration

Compounds with:
- **inversion-strategist** → Create systematic avoidance strategies
- **second-order-consequences** → Project impact of prevented failures
- **first-principles-decomposer** → Question hidden assumptions
- **mspot-generator** → Validate MSPOT projects before committing

---
See references/examples.md for Artem-specific pre-mortems

Related skills

OpenClaw

captchas-openclaw

captchasco

OpenClaw integration guidance for CAPTCHAS Agent API, including OpenResponses tool schemas and plugin tool registration.

OpenClaw

Modelready

carol-gutianle

name: modelready description: Start using a local or Hugging Face model instantly, directly from chat. metadata: {"openclaw":{"requires":{"bins": "bash", "curl" }, "env": "URL" }}

OpenClaw

Ethereum History

cartoonitunes

Read-only factual data about historical Ethereum mainnet contracts. Use when the user asks about a specific contract address, early Ethereum contracts, deployment era, deployer, bytecode, decompiled code, or do...