Rechercher

PythonReactSEOPDF
OpenClaw

pre-mortem-analyst

Imagine the project already failed, then work backward to find why. More powerful than risk assessment because it assumes failure is certain. Use when user says "pre-mortem", "premortem", "imagine this failed", "what could go wrong", "risk analysis", "before we launch", "stress test", "what would kill this", "project risks".

artyomx330 installations selon la source☆ 0 Étoiles du dépôt

Installation

Suivez les instructions du dépôt pour votre agent. Consultez les fichiers et dépendances avant l’installation.

SkillHub CLI

skillhub install artyomx33/pre-mortem-analyst

Examinez la source et la compatibilité, puis suivez les étapes d’installation.

Donnez le lien à votre agent et demandez-lui d’examiner instructions et dépendances avant d’expliquer les étapes.

Voir la source ↗Guides

Instructions

Pre-Mortem Analyst

Why Pre-Mortem > Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment: "What MIGHT go wrong?" → Optimism bias filters answers Pre-Mortem: "It's 6 months later. It FAILED. Why?" → Liberates honest analysis

Research: Pre-mortems increase problem identification by 30%.

The Process

  1. Set the scene: "It's [date]. This has failed completely."
  2. Brainstorm causes: List 10+ failure reasons (no filtering)
  3. Categorize: People, Process, Technology, External
  4. Rate: Likelihood × Impact (H/M/L)
  5. Prevent: Top 3 get specific mitigation actions
  6. Monitor: Define early warning signs

Output Format

PROJECT: [Name]
FAILURE SCENARIO: "It's [date]. [Project] has completely failed."

WHY IT FAILED:

👥 PEOPLE: [Cause] - L×I: H/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
⚙️ PROCESS: [Cause] - L×I: M/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
💻 TECHNOLOGY: [Cause] - L×I: L/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
🌍 EXTERNAL: [Cause] - L×I: M/M | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]

TOP 3 PRIORITIES:
1. [Risk] → [Specific action]
2. [Risk] → [Specific action]
3. [Risk] → [Specific action]

WARNING SIGNS TO MONITOR:
□ [Early indicator 1]
□ [Early indicator 2]

Common Failure Categories

Category Common Causes
People Key person leaves, skill gaps, misalignment, low buy-in
Process Aggressive timeline, scope creep, dependency issues
Tech Doesn't scale, integration fails, security breach
External Market shift, competitor move, regulation change

Integration

Compounds with:

  • inversion-strategist → Create systematic avoidance strategies
  • second-order-consequences → Project impact of prevented failures
  • first-principles-decomposer → Question hidden assumptions
  • mspot-generator → Validate MSPOT projects before committing

See references/examples.md for Artem-specific pre-mortems

Informations sur la source

Source
github
Repository
openclaw/skills
Path
skills/artyomx33/pre-mortem-analyst
Version
—
Commit
35acfa79ce48b5e41083af2534069dd67072bccd
Source de classification
rules
Statut
active
Visibilité
public

Ces informations proviennent de l’analyse indexée et peuvent être anciennes. Vérifiez les fichiers actuels.

Contenu extrait

SKILL.md
# Pre-Mortem Analyst

## Why Pre-Mortem > Risk Assessment

**Risk Assessment:** "What MIGHT go wrong?" → Optimism bias filters answers
**Pre-Mortem:** "It's 6 months later. It FAILED. Why?" → Liberates honest analysis

Research: Pre-mortems increase problem identification by 30%.

## The Process

1. **Set the scene:** "It's [date]. This has failed completely."
2. **Brainstorm causes:** List 10+ failure reasons (no filtering)
3. **Categorize:** People, Process, Technology, External
4. **Rate:** Likelihood × Impact (H/M/L)
5. **Prevent:** Top 3 get specific mitigation actions
6. **Monitor:** Define early warning signs

## Output Format

```
PROJECT: [Name]
FAILURE SCENARIO: "It's [date]. [Project] has completely failed."

WHY IT FAILED:

👥 PEOPLE: [Cause] - L×I: H/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
⚙️ PROCESS: [Cause] - L×I: M/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
💻 TECHNOLOGY: [Cause] - L×I: L/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
🌍 EXTERNAL: [Cause] - L×I: M/M | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]

TOP 3 PRIORITIES:
1. [Risk] → [Specific action]
2. [Risk] → [Specific action]
3. [Risk] → [Specific action]

WARNING SIGNS TO MONITOR:
□ [Early indicator 1]
□ [Early indicator 2]
```

## Common Failure Categories

| Category | Common Causes |
|----------|---------------|
| **People** | Key person leaves, skill gaps, misalignment, low buy-in |
| **Process** | Aggressive timeline, scope creep, dependency issues |
| **Tech** | Doesn't scale, integration fails, security breach |
| **External** | Market shift, competitor move, regulation change |

## Integration

Compounds with:
- **inversion-strategist** → Create systematic avoidance strategies
- **second-order-consequences** → Project impact of prevented failures
- **first-principles-decomposer** → Question hidden assumptions
- **mspot-generator** → Validate MSPOT projects before committing

---
See references/examples.md for Artem-specific pre-mortems

Skills associés

OpenClaw

captchas-openclaw

captchasco

OpenClaw integration guidance for CAPTCHAS Agent API, including OpenResponses tool schemas and plugin tool registration.

OpenClaw

Modelready

carol-gutianle

name: modelready description: Start using a local or Hugging Face model instantly, directly from chat. metadata: {"openclaw":{"requires":{"bins": "bash", "curl" }, "env": "URL" }}

OpenClaw

Ethereum History

cartoonitunes

Read-only factual data about historical Ethereum mainnet contracts. Use when the user asks about a specific contract address, early Ethereum contracts, deployment era, deployer, bytecode, decompiled code, or do...