搜索

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

test-case-design

Apply systematic test case design techniques including equivalence partitioning, boundary value analysis, decision tables, and state transition testing.

melodic-software☆ 21 仓库 Stars4 仓库 Forks

安装与使用

请根据来源仓库和你的 AI 工具说明安装此技能。先阅读技能文件和依赖要求,再添加到工作流。

查看来源 ↗使用指南

技能说明

Test Case Design Techniques

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Test Case Design tasks - Working on apply systematic test case design techniques including equivalence partitioning, boundary value analysis, decision tables, and state transition testing
  • Planning or design - Need guidance on Test Case Design approaches
  • Best practices - Want to follow established patterns and standards

Overview

Systematic test case design techniques ensure thorough coverage while minimizing test case count. These black-box techniques derive test cases from specifications without knowledge of internal implementation.

Equivalence Partitioning

Divide input data into equivalent classes where any value should produce the same behavior.

Process
  1. Identify input conditions
  2. Divide into valid and invalid partitions
  3. Select one representative value from each partition
  4. Create test cases for each partition
Example: Age Validation (18-65)
Partition Range Representative Expected
Invalid (below) < 18 10 Reject
Valid 18-65 30 Accept
Invalid (above) > 65 70 Reject

Test Cases:

  • TC1: age = 10 → Reject (invalid below)
  • TC2: age = 30 → Accept (valid)
  • TC3: age = 70 → Reject (invalid above)
Multiple Input Partitions

Combine partitions systematically:

Input A: {Valid, Invalid}
Input B: {Valid, Invalid}

Combinations:
1. A-Valid, B-Valid → Expected: Success
2. A-Valid, B-Invalid → Expected: Error for B
3. A-Invalid, B-Valid → Expected: Error for A
4. A-Invalid, B-Invalid → Expected: Error for both

Boundary Value Analysis

Test at and around partition boundaries where defects commonly occur.

Process
  1. Identify boundaries from equivalence partitions
  2. Test at minimum, just below, just above, and maximum
  3. Include special values (0, empty, null)
Example: Age Validation (18-65)
Boundary Test Values Expected
Below minimum 17 Reject
At minimum 18 Accept
Above minimum 19 Accept
Normal 40 Accept
Below maximum 64 Accept
At maximum 65 Accept
Above maximum 66 Reject

Extended Boundaries:

  • 0 (edge case)
  • -1 (negative)
  • MAX_INT (overflow)
  • null (missing)
.NET Example
public class AgeValidationTests
{
    [Theory]
    [InlineData(17, false)]  // Below minimum
    [InlineData(18, true)]   // At minimum
    [InlineData(19, true)]   // Above minimum
    [InlineData(40, true)]   // Normal
    [InlineData(64, true)]   // Below maximum
    [InlineData(65, true)]   // At maximum
    [InlineData(66, false)]  // Above maximum
    [InlineData(0, false)]   // Zero
    [InlineData(-1, false)]  // Negative
    public void ValidateAge_ReturnsExpected(int age, bool expected)
    {
        var result = _validator.IsValidAge(age);
        Assert.Equal(expected, result);
    }
}

Decision Table Testing

Test complex business rules with multiple conditions systematically.

Process
  1. Identify conditions (inputs)
  2. Identify actions (outputs)
  3. Create table with all condition combinations
  4. Simplify using "don't care" conditions
Example: Discount Calculation

Conditions:

  • Is member? (Y/N)
  • Order > $100? (Y/N)
  • Has coupon? (Y/N)

Actions:

  • Apply member discount (10%)
  • Apply bulk discount (5%)
  • Apply coupon discount (15%)
Rule Member Order>$100 Coupon Member% Bulk% Coupon%
R1 Y Y Y X X X
R2 Y Y N X X -
R3 Y N Y X - X
R4 Y N N X - -
R5 N Y Y - X X
R6 N Y N - X -
R7 N N Y - - X
R8 N N N - - -
.NET Example
public class DiscountCalculationTests
{
    public static TheoryData<bool, decimal, bool, decimal> DiscountScenarios => new()
    {
        { true, 150m, true, 0.30m },   // R1: Member + Bulk + Coupon
        { true, 150m, false, 0.15m },  // R2: Member + Bulk
        { true, 50m, true, 0.25m },    // R3: Member + Coupon
        { true, 50m, false, 0.10m },   // R4: Member only
        { false, 150m, true, 0.20m },  // R5: Bulk + Coupon
        { false, 150m, false, 0.05m }, // R6: Bulk only
        { false, 50m, true, 0.15m },   // R7: Coupon only
        { false, 50m, false, 0.00m },  // R8: No discount
    };

    [Theory]
    [MemberData(nameof(DiscountScenarios))]
    public void CalculateDiscount_ReturnsExpected(
        bool isMember, decimal orderTotal, bool hasCoupon, decimal expectedDiscount)
    {
        var discount = _calculator.Calculate(isMember, orderTotal, hasCoupon);
        Assert.Equal(expectedDiscount, discount);
    }
}

State Transition Testing

Test systems with distinct states and transitions between them.

Process
  1. Identify states
  2. Identify valid transitions
  3. Create state transition table/diagram
  4. Design tests for each transition
  5. Include invalid transition tests
Example: Order State Machine
         ┌──────────┐
         │  Draft   │
         └────┬─────┘
              │ submit()
              ▼
         ┌──────────┐
    ┌────│ Pending  │────┐
    │    └────┬─────┘    │
    │         │ approve()│ reject()
    │         ▼          ▼
    │    ┌──────────┐  ┌──────────┐
    │    │ Approved │  │ Rejected │
    │    └────┬─────┘  └──────────┘
    │         │ ship()
    │         ▼
    │    ┌──────────┐
    └────│ Shipped  │
         └────┬─────┘
              │ deliver()
              ▼
         ┌──────────┐
         │Delivered │
         └──────────┘
State Transition Table
Current State Event Next State Valid
Draft submit Pending ✓
Draft approve - ✗
Pending approve Approved ✓
Pending reject Rejected ✓
Approved ship Shipped ✓
Shipped deliver Delivered ✓
Delivered * - ✗
.NET Example
public class OrderStateTests
{
    [Fact]
    public void Draft_Submit_TransitionsToPending()
    {
        var order = new Order { Status = OrderStatus.Draft };
        order.Submit();
        Assert.Equal(OrderStatus.Pending, order.Status);
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Draft_Approve_ThrowsInvalidStateException()
    {
        var order = new Order { Status = OrderStatus.Draft };
        Assert.Throws<InvalidOperationException>(() => order.Approve());
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Delivered_AnyAction_ThrowsFinalStateException()
    {
        var order = new Order { Status = OrderStatus.Delivered };
        Assert.Throws<InvalidOperationException>(() => order.Cancel());
    }
}

Pairwise Testing

Efficiently test combinations when full combinatorial testing is impractical.

Concept

Most defects are caused by interactions between 2 parameters. Testing all pairs covers most risks with fewer tests.

Example: Browser Compatibility

Parameters:

  • Browser: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
  • OS: Windows, macOS, Linux
  • Version: Latest, Previous

Full combinations: 4 × 3 × 2 = 24 tests Pairwise coverage: 8-12 tests (covers all pairs)

Pairwise Test Set
Test Browser OS Version
1 Chrome Windows Latest
2 Firefox macOS Previous
3 Safari macOS Latest
4 Edge Windows Previous
5 Chrome Linux Previous
6 Firefox Windows Latest
7 Chrome macOS Latest
8 Edge Linux Latest

Use tools like PICT, AllPairs, or online generators.

Error Guessing

Experience-based technique to identify likely defect areas.

Common Error Patterns
Category Examples
Null/Empty null input, empty string, empty collection
Boundaries off-by-one, overflow, underflow
Format Invalid date, malformed email, wrong encoding
State Race conditions, stale data, concurrency
Resources Memory exhaustion, connection limits, timeouts
Security SQL injection, XSS, path traversal
Error Guessing Checklist
  • What if input is null?
  • What if input is empty?
  • What if input contains special characters?
  • What if input exceeds maximum length?
  • What if concurrent requests occur?
  • What if external service fails?
  • What if database connection drops?
  • What if input is negative?
  • What if list has duplicates?

Technique Selection Guide

Scenario Recommended Technique
Range validation Boundary Value + Equivalence
Complex business rules Decision Table
State-dependent behavior State Transition
Multi-parameter input Pairwise
Error handling Error Guessing
Critical calculations All techniques combined

Integration Points

Inputs from:

  • Requirements → Test conditions
  • test-strategy-planning skill → Coverage targets

Outputs to:

  • acceptance-criteria-authoring skill → Scenario coverage
  • Test automation → Test data

使用示例

查看来源仓库中的使用示例与配置说明。

查看来源 ↗

来源历史

收录时间
2026-01-20
索引更新时间
2026-02-04
Branch
main

收录与同步日期属于本站记录。源码修改历史请查看来源仓库。

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!