搜索

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

deepagents-architecture

Guides architectural decisions for Deep Agents applications. Use when deciding between Deep Agents vs alternatives, choosing backend strategies, designing subagent systems, or selecting middleware approaches.

existential-birds☆ 38 仓库 Stars5 仓库 Forks

安装与使用

请根据来源仓库和你的 AI 工具说明安装此技能。先阅读技能文件和依赖要求,再添加到工作流。

查看来源 ↗使用指南

技能说明

Deep Agents Architecture Decisions

When to Use Deep Agents

Use Deep Agents When You Need:
  • Long-horizon tasks - Complex workflows spanning dozens of tool calls
  • Planning capabilities - Task decomposition before execution
  • Filesystem operations - Reading, writing, and editing files
  • Subagent delegation - Isolated task execution with separate context windows
  • Persistent memory - Long-term storage across conversations
  • Human-in-the-loop - Approval gates for sensitive operations
  • Context management - Auto-summarization for long conversations
Consider Alternatives When:
Scenario Alternative Why
Single LLM call Direct API call Deep Agents overhead not justified
Simple RAG pipeline LangChain LCEL Simpler abstraction
Custom graph control flow LangGraph directly More flexibility
No file operations needed create_react_agent Lighter weight
Stateless tool use Function calling No middleware needed

Backend Selection

Backend Comparison
Backend Persistence Use Case Requires
StateBackend Ephemeral (per-thread) Working files, temp data Nothing (default)
FilesystemBackend Disk Local development, real files root_dir path
StoreBackend Cross-thread User preferences, knowledge bases LangGraph store
CompositeBackend Mixed Hybrid memory patterns Multiple backends
Backend Decision Tree
Need real disk access?
├─ Yes → FilesystemBackend(root_dir="/path")
└─ No
   └─ Need persistence across conversations?
      ├─ Yes → Need mixed ephemeral + persistent?
      │  ├─ Yes → CompositeBackend
      │  └─ No → StoreBackend
      └─ No → StateBackend (default)
CompositeBackend Routing

Route different paths to different storage backends:

from deepagents import create_deep_agent
from deepagents.backends import CompositeBackend, StateBackend, StoreBackend

agent = create_deep_agent(
    backend=CompositeBackend(
        default=StateBackend(),  # Working files (ephemeral)
        routes={
            "/memories/": StoreBackend(store=store),    # Persistent
            "/preferences/": StoreBackend(store=store), # Persistent
        },
    ),
)

Subagent Architecture

When to Use Subagents

Use subagents when:

  • Task is complex, multi-step, and can run independently
  • Task requires heavy context that would bloat the main thread
  • Multiple independent tasks can run in parallel
  • You need isolated execution (sandboxing)
  • You only care about the final result, not intermediate steps

Don't use subagents when:

  • Task is trivial (few tool calls)
  • You need to see intermediate reasoning
  • Splitting adds latency without benefit
  • Task depends on main thread state mid-execution
Subagent Patterns
Pattern 1: Parallel Research
         ┌─────────────┐
         │  Orchestrator│
         └──────┬──────┘
    ┌──────────┼──────────┐
    ▼          ▼          ▼
┌──────┐  ┌──────┐  ┌──────┐
│Task A│  │Task B│  │Task C│
└──┬───┘  └──┬───┘  └──┬───┘
   └──────────┼──────────┘
              ▼
      ┌─────────────┐
      │  Synthesize │
      └─────────────┘

Best for: Research on multiple topics, parallel analysis, batch processing.

Pattern 2: Specialized Agents
research_agent = {
    "name": "researcher",
    "description": "Deep research on complex topics",
    "system_prompt": "You are an expert researcher...",
    "tools": [web_search, document_reader],
}

coder_agent = {
    "name": "coder",
    "description": "Write and review code",
    "system_prompt": "You are an expert programmer...",
    "tools": [code_executor, linter],
}

agent = create_deep_agent(subagents=[research_agent, coder_agent])

Best for: Domain-specific expertise, different tool sets per task type.

Pattern 3: Pre-compiled Subagents
from deepagents import CompiledSubAgent, create_deep_agent

# Use existing LangGraph graph as subagent
custom_graph = create_react_agent(model=..., tools=...)

agent = create_deep_agent(
    subagents=[CompiledSubAgent(
        name="custom-workflow",
        description="Runs specialized workflow",
        runnable=custom_graph
    )]
)

Best for: Reusing existing LangGraph graphs, complex custom workflows.

Middleware Architecture

Built-in Middleware Stack

Deep Agents applies middleware in this order:

  1. TodoListMiddleware - Task planning with write_todos/read_todos
  2. FilesystemMiddleware - File ops: ls, read_file, write_file, edit_file, glob, grep, execute
  3. SubAgentMiddleware - Delegation via task tool
  4. SummarizationMiddleware - Auto-summarizes at ~85% context or 170k tokens
  5. AnthropicPromptCachingMiddleware - Caches system prompts (Anthropic only)
  6. PatchToolCallsMiddleware - Fixes dangling tool calls from interruptions
  7. HumanInTheLoopMiddleware - Pauses for approval (if interrupt_on configured)
Custom Middleware Placement
from langchain.agents.middleware import AgentMiddleware

class MyMiddleware(AgentMiddleware):
    tools = [my_custom_tool]

    def transform_request(self, request):
        # Modify system prompt, inject context
        return request

    def transform_response(self, response):
        # Post-process, log, filter
        return response

# Custom middleware added AFTER built-in stack
agent = create_deep_agent(middleware=[MyMiddleware()])
Middleware vs Tools Decision
Need Use Middleware Use Tools
Inject system prompt content ✅ ❌
Add tools dynamically ✅ ❌
Transform requests/responses ✅ ❌
Standalone capability ❌ ✅
User-invokable action ❌ ✅
Subagent Middleware Inheritance

Subagents receive their own middleware stack by default:

  • TodoListMiddleware
  • FilesystemMiddleware (shared backend)
  • SummarizationMiddleware
  • AnthropicPromptCachingMiddleware
  • PatchToolCallsMiddleware

Override with default_middleware=[] in SubAgentMiddleware or per-subagent middleware key.

Architecture Decision Checklist

Before implementing:

  1. Is Deep Agents the right tool? (vs LangGraph directly, vs simpler agent)
  2. Backend strategy chosen?
    • Ephemeral only → StateBackend (default)
    • Need disk access → FilesystemBackend
    • Need cross-thread persistence → StoreBackend or CompositeBackend
  3. Subagent strategy defined?
    • Which tasks benefit from isolation?
    • Custom subagents with specialized tools/prompts?
    • Parallel execution opportunities identified?
  4. Human-in-the-loop points defined?
    • Which tools need approval?
    • Approval flow (approve/edit/reject)?
  5. Custom middleware needed?
    • System prompt injection?
    • Request/response transformation?
  6. Context management considered?
    • Long conversations → summarization triggers
    • Large file handling → use references
  7. Checkpointing strategy? (for persistence/resume)

使用示例

查看来源仓库中的使用示例与配置说明。

查看来源 ↗

来源历史

收录时间
2026-03-11
索引更新时间
2026-03-11
Branch
main

收录与同步日期属于本站记录。源码修改历史请查看来源仓库。

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!