patterns-vertical-tdd
Structure implementation tasks using vertical slicing with TDD discipline. Use when creating task mappings, generating implementation tasks, or when you see "vertical slice", "TDD", "test first", "cycle structure", or "testable increment".
安装与使用
请根据来源仓库和你的 AI 工具说明安装此技能。先阅读技能文件和依赖要求,再添加到工作流。
查看来源 ↗使用指南技能说明
Vertical Slicing with TDD
Purpose
Transform requirements into implementation tasks organized as vertical slices with strict TDD discipline. Each slice (called a "cycle") delivers observable, testable value and follows test-first principles.
Core Principles
1. Vertical Over Horizontal
Wrong (horizontal slicing):
Phase 1: All models
Phase 2: All services
Phase 3: All endpoints
Phase 4: All tests
Right (vertical slicing):
Cycle 1: User creation (model + service + endpoint + test)
Cycle 2: User authentication (model + service + endpoint + test)
Cycle 3: User profile management (model + service + endpoint + test)
2. Test-First at Task Level
Every cycle structures tasks so tests come before implementation:
Cycle N: [Feature]
├── Task N.1: Write failing test
├── Task N.2: Implement to pass
├── Task N.3: Refactor and verify
└── Task N.4: Demo and validate
3. Foundation + Parallel
Foundation Cycles (sequential)
├── C1: Core data model + basic CRUD
├── C2: Authentication framework
└── C3: API infrastructure
Feature Cycles (parallel-eligible)
├── C4: [P] Search functionality
├── C5: [P] Filtering
├── C6: [P] Export feature
└── C7: Notifications (depends on C4)
4. Layered Testability
Each cycle must be testable at multiple levels:
- Automated tests: Unit, integration, and/or E2E tests
- Demonstrable behavior: Observable by stakeholders
- Contract verification: Meets acceptance criteria from spec
Identifying Vertical Slices
See SLICE-IDENTIFICATION.md for detailed heuristics on identifying good vertical slices from requirements.
Quick Heuristics
A good vertical slice:
- Delivers user value: Something a user could observe or use
- Touches all layers: Model, service, API, UI (as applicable)
- Is independently testable: Can verify it works without other slices
- Is sized appropriately: Completable in 1-3 implementation sessions
Slice Boundaries
| Boundary Signal | Action |
|---|---|
| Distinct user action | New cycle |
| Different acceptance scenario | May be new cycle or same cycle |
| Shared infrastructure need | Foundation cycle |
| Optional enhancement | Feature cycle (can parallelize) |
Cycle Structure
See CYCLE-STRUCTURE.md for detailed cycle formatting and examples.
Standard Cycle Format
### Cycle N: [Vertical slice description]
> Stories: US-X, US-Y
> Dependencies: C1, C2 (or "None")
> Type: Foundation | Feature [P]
- [ ] **TN.1**: Write failing E2E test for [behavior] in tests/e2e/test_[name].py
- [ ] **TN.2**: Implement [component] to pass test in src/[path]/[file].py
- [ ] **TN.3**: Refactor and verify tests pass
- [ ] **TN.4**: Demo [behavior], verify acceptance criteria
**Checkpoint**: [What should be observable/testable after this cycle]
Task Numbering
- Cycle 1 tasks: T1.1, T1.2, T1.3, T1.4
- Cycle 2 tasks: T2.1, T2.2, T2.3, T2.4
- etc.
Markers
| Marker | Meaning |
|---|---|
[P] |
Parallel-eligible (no dependencies blocking) |
[US#] |
Maps to user story number |
[EXTEND] |
Extends existing file (brownfield) |
[MODIFY] |
Modifies existing code (brownfield) |
Foundation vs Feature Cycles
Foundation Cycles
Purpose: Establish infrastructure that ALL features depend on.
Characteristics:
- Must complete before any feature cycle
- Sequential (C1 before C2 before C3)
- Typically includes: data models, auth, API framework, error handling
Identification: Ask "Could ANY user story start without this?" If no, it's foundation.
Feature Cycles
Purpose: Deliver user value incrementally.
Characteristics:
- Can start once foundation is complete
- Often parallel-eligible
- Map directly to user stories
- Independently testable
Identification: Ask "Does this deliver value a user could observe?" If yes, it's a feature.
TDD Task Sequence
Each cycle follows the red-green-refactor pattern:
Task 1: Write Failing Test (Red)
- [ ] **TN.1**: Write failing E2E test for [user action produces result] in tests/e2e/test_[feature].py
The test should:
- Express the acceptance criteria
- Be specific about expected behavior
- FAIL when run (nothing implemented yet)
Task 2: Implement to Pass (Green)
- [ ] **TN.2**: Implement [component] to pass test in src/[path]/[file].py
Implementation should:
- Make the test pass
- Be minimal (just enough to pass)
- Include all necessary layers (model, service, endpoint)
Task 3: Refactor and Verify
- [ ] **TN.3**: Refactor and verify tests pass
Refactoring should:
- Improve code quality without changing behavior
- Ensure all tests still pass
- Address any code review concerns
Task 4: Demo and Validate
- [ ] **TN.4**: Demo [behavior], verify acceptance criteria
Validation should:
- Demonstrate the feature to stakeholders (if applicable)
- Verify against spec acceptance criteria
- Confirm the slice is "done"
Mapping Stories to Cycles
Simple Case: Story = Cycle
When a user story is well-scoped, it becomes one cycle:
US-1: As a user, I can create a task with a title
→ Cycle 1: Task creation
Split Case: Story > Cycle
When a story is too large, split into multiple cycles:
US-2: As a user, I can manage my tasks (create, edit, delete, complete)
→ Cycle 2: Task creation (foundation)
→ Cycle 3: Task editing
→ Cycle 4: Task deletion
→ Cycle 5: Task completion
Merge Case: Stories < Cycle
When stories are too small, merge into one cycle:
US-3: As a user, I can see task count
US-4: As a user, I can see completed count
→ Cycle 6: Task statistics (covers US-3 and US-4)
Quality Checklist
Before finalizing task mapping or task list:
- Every P1/P2 story maps to at least one cycle
- Cycles are vertical slices (not horizontal layers)
- Foundation cycles identified and sequenced
- Feature cycles marked [P] where appropriate
- Each cycle has TDD structure (test first)
- Every task has specific file path
- Dependencies are minimal and explicit
- Cycles are independently testable
使用示例
查看来源仓库中的使用示例与配置说明。
查看来源 ↗来源历史
- 收录时间
- 2026-01-20
- 索引更新时间
- 2026-02-04
- Branch
- main
收录与同步日期属于本站记录。源码修改历史请查看来源仓库。
GitHub ↗chat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!