搜索

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

data-substrate-analysis

Analyze fundamental data primitives, type systems, and state management patterns in a codebase. Use when (1) evaluating typing strategies (Pydantic vs TypedDict vs loose dicts), (2) assessing immutability and mutation patterns, (3) understanding serialization approaches, (4) documenting state shape and lifecycle, or (5) comparing data modeling approaches across frameworks.

aiskillstore☆ 124 仓库 Stars6 仓库 Forks

安装与使用

请根据来源仓库和你的 AI 工具说明安装此技能。先阅读技能文件和依赖要求,再添加到工作流。

查看来源 ↗使用指南

技能说明

Data Substrate Analysis

Analyzes the fundamental units of data and state management patterns.

Process

  1. Locate type files — Find types.py, schema.py, models.py, state.py
  2. Classify typing — Strict (Pydantic), structural (TypedDict), loose (dict)
  3. Analyze mutation — In-place modification vs. copy-on-write
  4. Document serialization — json(), dict(), pickle, custom methods

Typing Strategy Classification

Detection Patterns
Strategy Indicators Files to Check
Pydantic BaseModel, Field(), validator models.py, schema.py
Dataclass @dataclass, field() types.py, models.py
TypedDict TypedDict, Required[], NotRequired[] types.py
NamedTuple NamedTuple, typing.NamedTuple types.py
Loose Dict[str, Any], plain dict Throughout
Analysis Questions
  • Are boundaries validated (API ingress/egress)?
  • Is nesting depth reasonable (<3 levels)?
  • Are optional fields explicit or implicit None?
  • Version migration path (Pydantic V1 → V2)?

Immutability Analysis

Mutable Patterns (Risk Indicators)
# In-place list modification
state.messages.append(msg)
state.history.extend(new_items)

# Direct dict mutation
state['key'] = value
state.update(new_data)

# Object attribute mutation
state.status = 'complete'
Immutable Patterns (Safer)
# Pydantic copy
new_state = state.model_copy(update={'key': value})

# Dataclass replace
new_state = replace(state, messages=[*state.messages, msg])

# Spread operator style
new_state = {**state, 'key': value}

# Frozen dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class State: ...

Serialization Strategy

Common Patterns
Method Code Pattern Trade-offs
Pydantic JSON .model_dump_json() Type-safe, automatic
Pydantic Dict .model_dump() For internal use
Dataclass asdict(obj) Manual, no validation
Custom to_dict(), from_dict() Full control
Pickle pickle.dumps() Fast, fragile, security risk
JSON json.dumps(obj, default=...) Requires encoder
Questions to Answer
  • Is serialization implicit (automatic) or explicit (manual)?
  • How are nested objects handled?
  • Is deserialization validated?
  • What happens with unknown fields?

Output Template

## Data Substrate Analysis: [Framework Name]

### Typing Strategy
- **Primary Approach**: [Pydantic/Dataclass/TypedDict/Loose]
- **Key Files**: [List of files]
- **Nesting Depth**: [Shallow/Medium/Deep]
- **Validation**: [At boundaries/Everywhere/None]

### Core Primitives

| Type | Location | Purpose | Mutability |
|------|----------|---------|------------|
| Message | schema.py:L15 | Chat message | Immutable |
| State | state.py:L42 | Agent state | Mutable ⚠️ |
| Result | types.py:L78 | Tool output | Immutable |

### Mutation Analysis
- **Pattern**: [In-place/Copy-on-write/Mixed]
- **Risk Areas**: [List of mutable state locations]
- **Concurrency Safe**: [Yes/No/Partial]

### Serialization
- **Method**: [Pydantic/Custom/JSON]
- **Implicit/Explicit**: [Description]
- **Round-trip Tested**: [Yes/No/Unknown]

Integration

  • Prerequisite: codebase-mapping to identify type files
  • Feeds into: comparative-matrix for typing decisions
  • Related: resilience-analysis for error handling in serialization

使用示例

查看来源仓库中的使用示例与配置说明。

查看来源 ↗

来源历史

收录时间
2026-01-20
索引更新时间
2026-01-28
Branch
main

收录与同步日期属于本站记录。源码修改历史请查看来源仓库。

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!