搜索

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

metacognitive-guard

Monitors Claude's responses for struggle signals and suggests escalation to deep-thinking agents when complexity exceeds comfortable reasoning capacity.

aiskillstore☆ 122 仓库 Stars6 仓库 Forks

安装与使用

请根据来源仓库和你的 AI 工具说明安装此技能。先阅读技能文件和依赖要求,再添加到工作流。

查看来源 ↗使用指南

技能说明

Metacognitive Guard Skill

This skill provides awareness of the struggle detection system and guidance on when to proactively engage deep-thinking resources.

When to Self-Escalate

Even before the struggle detector triggers, consider spawning deep-think-partner when:

High-Complexity Indicators
  1. Architectural decisions with competing constraints

    • Multiple valid approaches exist
    • Trade-offs span different dimensions (performance, maintainability, cost)
    • Decision affects multiple system components
  2. Ambiguous requirements requiring interpretation

    • User hasn't specified implementation details
    • Multiple reasonable interpretations exist
    • Wrong choice has significant rework cost
  3. Multi-domain synthesis required

    • Problem spans multiple technology areas
    • Integration patterns aren't obvious
    • Prior art doesn't directly apply
  4. Edge case analysis needed

    • Happy path is clear but edge cases aren't
    • Failure modes need systematic exploration
    • Concurrency or timing issues involved
Self-Assessment Checklist

Before responding to complex questions, ask yourself:

  • Can I give a concrete recommendation (not "it depends")?
  • Do I have high confidence in my answer?
  • Is this answerable without multiple follow-up exchanges?
  • Would a structured analysis add significant value?

If you answer "no" to any of these, consider proactive escalation.

How to Escalate

Use the Task tool with the deep-think-partner agent:

Task tool:
    subagent_type: deep-think-partner
    prompt: [Detailed problem statement with all constraints]
    description: [3-5 word summary]
Good Prompts for Deep-Think Partner

Include:

  • Context: What system/codebase is this for?
  • Constraints: What limits the solution space?
  • Success criteria: How do we know we got it right?
  • Specific question: What decision needs to be made?
Example Escalation

User asks: "Should we use Redis or PostgreSQL for session storage?"

Self-assessment: Multiple valid approaches, depends on constraints not yet explored, "it depends" isn't helpful.

Escalation:

Task tool:
    subagent_type: deep-think-partner
    prompt: |
        Context: Web application with 10k concurrent users, existing PostgreSQL database.
        Question: Redis vs PostgreSQL for session storage.
        Constraints: Team has PostgreSQL expertise, no Redis experience.
        Must handle session expiry. Cost-sensitive.
        Success: Clear recommendation with migration path.
    description: Analyze session storage options

Understanding Struggle Signals

The automatic detector looks for these patterns in your responses:

Signal What It Means Better Approach
Hedging Uncertainty about recommendation Escalate for deeper analysis
Deflecting Avoiding commitment with questions Answer then ask clarifying questions
Verbose Rambling without concrete output Structure response, include code/tables
Contradiction Changed position mid-response Stop, think, give one coherent answer
Apologetic Previous response was wrong Acknowledge, correct, move forward
Weaseling Non-committal to avoid being wrong Make a recommendation with confidence level

Integration with Deep-Think Partner

When deep-think-partner returns its analysis:

  1. Don't just paste it - synthesize for the user
  2. Highlight the key insight - what's the non-obvious finding?
  3. Present the recommendation clearly - don't bury it
  4. Offer the implementation plan - if user wants to proceed

Metrics

Track your struggle detection rate to improve:

  • How often does the detector trigger?
  • Are triggers false positives or genuine struggles?
  • Does escalation produce better outcomes?

Self-awareness of your own patterns helps calibrate both the detector and your escalation instincts.

使用示例

查看来源仓库中的使用示例与配置说明。

查看来源 ↗

来源历史

收录时间
2026-01-20
索引更新时间
2026-01-28
Branch
main

收录与同步日期属于本站记录。源码修改历史请查看来源仓库。

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!