Search

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

documentation

Centralizes Diataxis documentation framework guidance so Claude can write, review, or improve documentation following the four distinct types (tutorials, how-to guides, reference, explanation).

wodsmith☆ 1 Repository stars1 Repository forks

Installation

Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.

View source ↗Guides

Skill instructions

Documentation Skill

Unifies all Diataxis documentation guidance into one Skill. Claude activates this Skill whenever documentation should be written, reviewed, or improved, and then "lazy loads" the exact documentation type guidance by opening the reference docs linked below.

Critical Workflow

REQUIRED: Before writing or reviewing ANY documentation, you MUST load the relevant documentation type reference file(s) using the Read tool.

  1. Use the Compass to identify the documentation type needed (see below)
  2. Read the matching reference file(s) BEFORE writing/reviewing:
    • Learning experiences → Read references/tutorials.md
    • Task-oriented guides → Read references/how-to-guides.md
    • Information lookup → Read references/reference.md
    • Understanding & context → Read references/explanation.md
  3. Apply the documentation type's principles from the loaded reference
  4. Write or review documentation according to that type's standards

DO NOT attempt to write or review documentation without first loading the appropriate reference file(s).

The Diataxis Compass

The compass is your primary decision-making tool. Ask two questions:

Question 1: Action or Cognition?
  • Action = Practical steps, doing things, hands-on work
  • Cognition = Theoretical knowledge, thinking, understanding
Question 2: Acquisition or Application?
  • Acquisition = Study, learning something new
  • Application = Work, using skills to accomplish tasks
The Four Quadrants
                    ACQUISITION              APPLICATION
                    (Study)                  (Work)
              ┌─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┐
              │                     │                     │
   ACTION     │     TUTORIALS       │    HOW-TO GUIDES    │
   (Doing)    │   Learning-oriented │    Task-oriented    │
              │   "Teach me"        │    "Help me do X"   │
              │                     │                     │
              ├─────────────────────┼─────────────────────┤
              │                     │                     │
   COGNITION  │    EXPLANATION      │     REFERENCE       │
   (Knowing)  │ Understanding-      │  Information-       │
              │    oriented         │     oriented        │
              │   "Help me          │    "What is the     │
              │    understand"      │     spec for X?"    │
              └─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┘
Quick Decision Guide
User Need Action/Cognition Acquisition/Application → Type
"How do I get started?" Action Acquisition Tutorial
"How do I deploy to prod?" Action Application How-to
"What parameters does X accept?" Cognition Application Reference
"Why does the system work this way?" Cognition Acquisition Explanation

Key Distinctions (Critical!)

Tutorial vs How-to Guide

Both contain steps, but serve fundamentally different purposes:

Aspect Tutorial How-to Guide
User Learner, may not know enough to ask questions Competent practitioner who knows their goal
Responsibility Teacher bears responsibility for success User bears responsibility for outcomes
Approach Concrete, specific, controlled environment General, adaptable to real-world variation
Path Single path, no choices Multiple routes, branching options
Completeness Must be complete end-to-end Can start/end at reasonable points
Safety Must be safe, can always restart Cannot promise safety
Focus Learning through doing Getting work done
Reference vs Explanation

Both provide knowledge, but for different contexts:

Test Question If Yes → If No →
Would someone turn to this while actively working? Reference Explanation
Could you imagine reading this in the bath? Explanation Reference
Is it lists, tables, or technical specs? Reference Explanation
Does it answer "why?" questions? Explanation Reference

Applying Diataxis: Iterative Approach

Do NOT create empty structures. Don't create /tutorials, /how-to, /reference, /explanation folders with nothing in them.

Start small:

  1. Pick any existing documentation
  2. Apply compass to determine what type it should be
  3. Improve it according to that type's principles
  4. Repeat

Let structure emerge: As you improve individual pieces, patterns will emerge that suggest organizational structure. The top-level structure forms from the inside out.

Documentation Type References (load on demand)

  • Tutorials - Learning-oriented experiences enabling skill acquisition through guided practice
  • How-to Guides - Task-oriented directions for accomplishing specific goals
  • Reference - Information-oriented technical descriptions for authoritative lookup
  • Explanation - Understanding-oriented discussions providing context and answering "why?"

Key Principles

  1. Different contexts need different documentation - Users learning need tutorials; users working need how-to guides or reference; users seeking understanding need explanation
  2. Separation of concerns - Keep documentation types distinct to prevent confusion
  3. User-centered approach - Consider what the user is trying to accomplish and in what context
  4. Iterative improvement - Enhance documentation incrementally by applying Diataxis principles
  5. Purpose-driven structure - Each type has specific characteristics that make it effective for its intended purpose

Examples

Read the usage examples in the source repository.

View source ↗

Source history

Indexed on
2026-01-20
Index updated
2026-02-03
Branch
main

Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!