Search

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

quality-standards

Overview of protected quality thresholds and quick reference for all quality tools. Use when you need to understand quality metrics, run comprehensive quality checks, or learn which specialized skill to use. For specific issues, use dedicated skills (deptrac-fixer for Deptrac, complexity-management for PHPInsights, testing-workflow for coverage).

VilnaCRM-Org☆ 16 Repository stars2 Repository forks

Installation

Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.

View source ↗Guides

Skill instructions

Quality Standards Skill

Context (Input)

  • Need to understand protected quality thresholds
  • Running comprehensive quality checks before commit
  • Determining which specialized skill to use for specific issues
  • Quick reference for quality tool commands

Task (Function)

Understand quality metrics and route to appropriate specialized skill for fixes.

Success Criteria: Know which skill to use for your specific quality issue.

Protected Quality Thresholds

CRITICAL: These thresholds are protected and must NEVER be lowered.

PHPInsights (Source Code)
Metric Required Fix With
Quality 100% complexity-management
Complexity 94% complexity-management
Architecture 100% deptrac-fixer
Style 100% Run make phpcsfixer
PHPInsights (Tests)
Metric Required Fix With
Quality 95% complexity-management
Complexity 95% complexity-management
Architecture 90% deptrac-fixer
Style 95% Run make phpcsfixer
Other Tools
Tool Metric Required Fix With
Deptrac Violations 0 deptrac-fixer
Psalm Errors 0 Fix reported issues
Psalm Security Issues 0 Fix tainted flows
Infection MSI 100% testing-workflow
PHPUnit Coverage 100% testing-workflow

Quick Reference Commands

Comprehensive Checks
# Run all CI checks (recommended before commit)
make ci

Success: Must output "✅ CI checks successfully passed!"

Individual Quality Checks
Check Command Purpose
Code quality make phpinsights All PHPInsights metrics
Complexity analysis make phpmd Find high-complexity methods
Static analysis make psalm Type checking and errors
Security taint make psalm-security Security vulnerability scan
Architecture make deptrac Layer boundary validation
Code style make phpcsfixer Auto-fix PSR-12 style
Composer validation make composer-validate Validate composer.json
Testing Commands
Check Command Purpose
Unit tests make unit-tests Domain/Application logic
Integration tests make integration-tests Component interactions
E2E tests make behat Full user scenarios (Behat)
All tests make all-tests Unit + Integration + E2E
Test coverage make tests-with-coverage Generate coverage report
Mutation tests make infection Test quality validation

Routing to Specialized Skills

When quality checks fail, use the appropriate specialized skill:

Architecture Issues
  • Deptrac violations → deptrac-fixer

    • Domain depends on Infrastructure
    • Layer boundary violations
    • "must not depend on" errors
  • DDD architecture patterns → implementing-ddd-architecture

    • Creating new entities/value objects
    • Implementing CQRS patterns
    • Understanding layer responsibilities
Code Quality Issues
  • High cyclomatic complexity → complexity-management

    • PHPInsights complexity < 94%
    • PHPMD reports high CCN
    • Methods too complex
  • Code style issues → Run make phpcsfixer

    • PSR-12 violations
    • Line length > 100 chars
    • Formatting issues
Testing Issues
  • Test failures → testing-workflow
    • Unit/Integration/E2E failures
    • Mutation testing (Infection)
    • Test coverage < 100%
Workflow Integration
  • Before committing → ci-workflow

    • Run all checks systematically
    • Fix failures in priority order
    • Ensure all checks pass
  • PR review feedback → code-review

    • Fetch and address PR comments
    • Systematic comment resolution

Quality Improvement Workflow

Step 1: Run Comprehensive Checks
make ci
Step 2: Identify Failing Check

Check output for specific failure:

❌ CI checks failed:
  - phpinsights: Complexity score too low (93.5% < 94%)
Step 3: Use Specialized Skill

Based on failure type, use appropriate skill:

Failure Pattern Skill to Use
"Complexity score too low" complexity-management
"Deptrac violations" deptrac-fixer
"must not depend on" deptrac-fixer
"tests failed" testing-workflow
"Psalm found errors" Fix type errors directly
"escaped mutants" testing-workflow
Step 4: Re-run CI
make ci

Repeat until: "✅ CI checks successfully passed!"

Constraints (Parameters)

NEVER
  • Lower quality thresholds in config files (phpinsights.php, infection.json5, etc.)
  • Skip failing checks to "save time"
  • Commit code without all CI checks passing
  • Modify deptrac.yaml to allow violations (fix code, not config)
  • Disable security checks
ALWAYS
  • Fix code to meet standards (not config to meet code)
  • Run make ci before creating commits
  • Use specialized skills for specific quality issues
  • Maintain 100% test coverage
  • Keep cyclomatic complexity low (target: < 5 per method)
  • Respect hexagonal architecture boundaries

Format (Output)

Expected CI Output
✅ CI checks successfully passed!
Expected PHPInsights Output
[CODE] 100.0 pts       ✅ Target: 100%
[COMPLEXITY] 94.0 pts  ✅ Target: 94%
[ARCHITECTURE] 100 pts ✅ Target: 100%
[STYLE] 100.0 pts      ✅ Target: 100%
Expected Deptrac Output
✅ No violations found
Expected Infection Output
Mutation Score Indicator (MSI): 100%

Verification Checklist

After using this skill:

  • Identified which quality check is failing
  • Selected appropriate specialized skill for the issue
  • Ready to execute specialized skill workflow
  • Understand which threshold applies to the failure
  • Know the command to re-run the check after fixes

Related Skills

Reference Documentation

For detailed examples and patterns, see:

  • Refactoring patterns → complexity-management skill
  • Architecture rules → implementing-ddd-architecture skill
  • Layer boundaries → deptrac-fixer skill
  • Testing strategies → testing-workflow skill

Examples

Read the usage examples in the source repository.

View source ↗

Source history

Indexed on
2026-01-20
Index updated
2026-01-26
Branch
main

Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!