formatting-audits
Design document review format with 100-point scoring system for SOW/Spec. Use when reviewing SOW or Spec documents, scoring design quality, or when user mentions SOW review, Spec review, 設計書レビュー, 品質スコア, document scoring.
Installation
Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.
View source ↗GuidesSkill instructions
SOW/Spec Scoring (100-point)
Scoring
| Category | Score | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 0-25 | ✓/→/? markers, evidence |
| Completeness | 0-25 | All sections, testable AC |
| Relevance | 0-25 | Goals ↔ solutions, no YAGNI |
| Actionability | 0-25 | Specific steps, feasibility |
Deductions
| Issue | Points |
|---|---|
| No confidence marker | -5 |
| Missing required section | -10 |
| AC without test scenario | -5 |
| Vague action item | -5 |
| YAGNI violation | -5 |
| Inconsistent AC-FR map | -10 |
Thresholds
| Score | Judgment | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | PASS | Proceed to next phase |
| 70-89 | CONDITIONAL | Re-review after fixes |
| 0-69 | FAIL | Major revision needed |
Examples
Read the usage examples in the source repository.
View source ↗Source history
- Indexed on
- 2026-01-20
- Index updated
- 2026-01-26
- Branch
- main
Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.
GitHub ↗chat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!