Search

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

quality-audit-workflow

Comprehensive codebase quality audit with parallel agent orchestration, GitHub issue creation, automated PR generation per issue, and PM-prioritized recommendations. Use for code review, refactoring audits, technical debt analysis, module quality assessment, or codebase health checks.

rysweet☆ 16 Repository stars7 Repository forks

Installation

Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.

View source ↗Guides

Skill instructions

Quality Audit Workflow

Purpose

Orchestrates a systematic, parallel quality audit of any codebase with automated remediation through PR generation and PM-prioritized recommendations.

When I Activate

I automatically load when you mention:

  • "quality audit" or "code audit"
  • "codebase review" or "full code review"
  • "refactoring opportunities" or "technical debt audit"
  • "module quality check" or "architecture review"
  • "parallel analysis" with multiple agents

What I Do

Execute a 6-phase workflow that:

  1. Familiarizes with the project (investigation phase)
  2. Audits using parallel agents across codebase divisions
  3. Creates GitHub issues for each discovered problem
  4. Generates PRs in parallel worktrees per issue
  5. Reviews PRs with PM architect for prioritization
  6. Reports consolidated recommendations in master issue

Quick Start

User: "Run a quality audit on this codebase"
Skill: *activates automatically*
       "Beginning quality audit workflow..."

The 6 Phases

Phase 1: Project Familiarization
  • Run investigation workflow on project structure
  • Map modules, dependencies, and entry points
  • Understand existing patterns and architecture
Phase 2: Parallel Quality Audit
  • Divide codebase into logical sections
  • Deploy multiple agent types per section (analyzer, reviewer, security, optimizer)
  • Apply PHILOSOPHY.md standards ruthlessly
  • Check module size, complexity, single responsibility
Phase 3: Issue Assembly
  • Create GitHub issue for each finding
  • Include severity, location, recommendation
  • Tag with appropriate labels
Phase 4: Parallel PR Generation
  • Create worktree per issue (worktrees/fix-issue-XXX)
  • Run DEFAULT_WORKFLOW.md in each worktree
  • Generate fix PR for each issue
Phase 5: PM Review
  • Invoke pm-architect skill
  • Group PRs by category and priority
  • Identify dependencies between fixes
Phase 6: Master Report
  • Create master GitHub issue
  • Link all related issues and PRs
  • Prioritized action plan with recommendations

Philosophy Enforcement

This workflow ruthlessly applies:

  • Ruthless Simplicity: Flag over-engineered modules
  • Module Size Limits: Target <300 LOC per module
  • Single Responsibility: One purpose per brick
  • Zero-BS: No stubs, no TODOs, no dead code

Navigation Guide

When to Read Supporting Files

reference.md - Read when you need:

  • Detailed phase execution steps
  • Agent-to-phase mappings
  • Codebase division strategies
  • Issue template formats

examples.md - Read when you need:

  • Working audit examples
  • Sample issue/PR formats
  • Real-world usage patterns
  • Output format examples

Configuration

Override defaults via environment or prompt:

  • AUDIT_PARALLEL_LIMIT: Max concurrent worktrees (default: 8)
  • AUDIT_SEVERITY_THRESHOLD: Minimum severity to create issue (default: medium)
  • AUDIT_MODULE_LOC_LIMIT: Flag modules exceeding this LOC (default: 300)

Examples

Read the usage examples in the source repository.

View source ↗

Source history

Indexed on
2026-01-20
Index updated
2026-01-27
Branch
main

Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!