decision-archaeology
Investigate why code was written a certain way. Use when tracing decision history through git blame, commit logs, PRs, and issues to understand the reasoning behind code changes.
Installation
Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.
View source ↗GuidesSkill instructions
Decision Archaeology Skill
Rules
Read-only operations only.
For gh api: GET requests only. No -X POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE or -f/-F flags.
Workflow
- Identify code - Target file, lines, or function
-
Find commit -
git blame→ introducing commit -
Trace PR/Issue - Check commit message for
#123references - Summarize rationale - Output findings
For detailed commands: See references/commands.md
Key Commands
git blame -L <start>,<end> <file> # Find who changed lines
git log -S "code" --oneline # Find when code was added
gh pr list --search "<sha>" --state all # Find PR for commit
Output Format
## Decision Archaeology Report
### Target
- File: [path/to/file]
- Lines: [XX-YY]
### Timeline
#### [Date] Commit: [short-sha]
- Author: [name]
- Message: [commit message]
- PR: #[number] [title]
- Related Issue: #[number]
### Decision Rationale
[Summary of why, based on PR discussions, issue context, commit messages]
### Key References
- PR #[number]: [URL]
- Issue #[number]: [URL]
- Commit: [sha]
Tips
- Start with
git blameto find introducing commit - Check commit message for
#123references - PR descriptions and review comments contain the "why"
Examples
Read the usage examples in the source repository.
View source ↗Source history
- Indexed on
- 2026-01-20
- Index updated
- 2026-01-26
- Branch
- main
Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.
GitHub ↗chat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!