canonical-spec-format
Canonical specification format reference. Use when understanding the canonical spec schema, field requirements, provider-agnostic specification structure, or validating specifications against the schema.
Installation
Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.
View source ↗GuidesSkill instructions
Canonical Specification Format
Reference guide for the canonical specification format - the provider-agnostic intermediate representation defined in ADR-115.
When to Use This Skill
Keywords: canonical specification, canonical spec, spec schema, specification format, provider-agnostic, spec fields, spec validation, spec structure, YAML specification, JSON schema
Use this skill when:
- Understanding canonical specification structure
- Validating specifications against schema
- Creating specifications manually
- Mapping between providers and canonical format
- Debugging specification transformation issues
Quick Reference
Minimal Valid Specification
id: "SPEC-001"
title: "Feature Title"
type: feature
context:
problem: "Problem description (min 20 chars)"
motivation: "Business value"
requirements:
- id: "REQ-001"
text: "The system SHALL do something"
priority: must
ears_type: ubiquitous
acceptance_criteria:
- id: "AC-001"
given: "precondition"
when: "action"
then: "outcome"
metadata:
status: draft
created: "2025-12-24"
provider: canonical
Required Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
id |
string | Format: SPEC-{number} |
title |
string | Human-readable title |
type |
enum | feature, bug, chore, spike, tech-debt |
context.problem |
string | Min 20 characters |
context.motivation |
string | Business value |
requirements |
array | At least one requirement |
metadata.status |
enum | draft, review, approved, implemented, deprecated |
metadata.created |
string | ISO 8601 date |
metadata.provider |
string | Provider that created this spec |
Field Reference
Root Level
id: "SPEC-001" # Required: Unique identifier
title: "Feature Title" # Required: Human-readable name
type: feature # Required: Specification type
Type Values:
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
feature |
New functionality or capability |
bug |
Defect fix |
chore |
Maintenance task |
spike |
Research or investigation |
tech-debt |
Technical debt reduction |
Context Section
context:
problem: | # Required: min 20 chars
Clear description of the problem.
What pain point does this address?
motivation: | # Required
Business value or user benefit.
Why should we invest in this?
background: | # Optional
Additional context, history, constraints
Requirements Section
requirements:
- id: "REQ-001" # Required: Unique within spec
text: "EARS requirement" # Required: EARS-formatted
priority: must # Required: must/should/could/wont
ears_type: event-driven # Required: EARS pattern type
acceptance_criteria: # Required: at least one
- id: "AC-001"
given: "precondition"
when: "action"
then: "outcome"
and: # Optional: additional conditions
- "additional condition"
notes: "Optional notes" # Optional
Priority Values (MoSCoW):
| Priority | Description |
|---|---|
must |
Non-negotiable, system fails without it |
should |
Important but not critical |
could |
Desirable if resources permit |
wont |
Explicitly excluded from scope |
EARS Type Values:
| Type | Pattern | Example |
|---|---|---|
ubiquitous |
The system SHALL... | "The system SHALL encrypt data" |
state-driven |
WHILE..., the system SHALL... | "WHILE active, the system SHALL..." |
event-driven |
WHEN..., the system SHALL... | "WHEN clicked, the system SHALL..." |
unwanted |
IF..., THEN the system SHALL... | "IF error, THEN the system SHALL..." |
complex |
Combinations | "WHILE active, WHEN clicked..." |
optional |
WHERE..., the system SHALL... | "WHERE enabled, the system SHALL..." |
Design Section (Optional)
design:
approach: | # Optional: implementation approach
High-level description of how to implement
components: # Optional: affected components
- "Component 1"
- "Component 2"
dependencies: # Optional: prerequisites
- "External dependency"
alternatives: # Optional: considered alternatives
- name: "Alternative approach"
reason_rejected: "Why not chosen"
Traceability Section (Optional)
traceability:
adr_refs: # Optional: related ADRs
- "ADR-115"
requirement_refs: # Optional: related requirements
- "FR-001"
- "NFR-001"
epic_ref: "EPIC-1118" # Optional: parent EPIC
user_story_refs: # Optional: related user stories
- "US-001"
Metadata Section
metadata:
status: draft # Required
created: "2025-12-24" # Required: ISO 8601
provider: canonical # Required
version: "1.0.0" # Optional: semantic version
bounded_context: "WorkManagement" # Optional: from ADR-024
Status Values:
| Status | Description |
|---|---|
draft |
Initial creation, not reviewed |
review |
Under review/refinement |
approved |
Approved for implementation |
implemented |
Implementation complete |
deprecated |
No longer valid |
Bounded Context Values (ADR-024):
- WorkManagement
- Orchestration
- Workflows
- Expertise
- ExecutionControl
- TriggerManagement
- Integrations
Validation Rules
ID Formats
| Field | Format | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Specification ID | SPEC-{number} | SPEC-042 |
| Requirement ID | REQ-{number} | REQ-001 |
| Acceptance Criterion ID | AC-{number} | AC-001 |
| ADR Reference | ADR-{number} | ADR-115 |
| EPIC Reference | EPIC-{number} | EPIC-1118 |
| User Story Reference | US-{number} | US-001 |
Content Constraints
| Field | Constraint |
|---|---|
context.problem |
Minimum 20 characters |
requirements |
At least one requirement |
acceptance_criteria |
At least one criterion per requirement |
metadata.created |
Valid ISO 8601 date |
EARS Pattern Validation
Each requirement's text field must match its declared ears_type:
| ears_type | Required Pattern |
|---|---|
ubiquitous |
Starts with "The" + entity + "SHALL" |
state-driven |
Starts with "WHILE" |
event-driven |
Starts with "WHEN" |
unwanted |
Contains "IF" and "THEN" |
optional |
Starts with "WHERE" |
complex |
Multiple pattern keywords |
JSON Schema Location
schemas/canonical-spec.schema.json
Provider Transformation
The canonical format serves as the hub for all provider transformations:
┌─────────────┐
│ Canonical │
│ Spec │
└──────┬──────┘
┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
│ │ │ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐
│EARS │ │Ghrkn│ │Kiro │ │SpKit│ │ ADR │
└─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘
All providers implement ISpecificationProvider:
interface ISpecificationProvider
{
string ProviderName { get; }
Task<Result<CanonicalSpec>> ParseAsync(string input);
Task<Result<string>> GenerateAsync(CanonicalSpec spec);
Task<ValidationResult> ValidateAsync(CanonicalSpec spec);
bool CanParse(string input);
}
References
Detailed Documentation:
Repository Resources:
-
schemas/canonical-spec.schema.json- JSON Schema -
docs/adr/ADR-115-specification-provider-abstraction.md- Architecture decision
Last Updated: 2025-12-26
Examples
Read the usage examples in the source repository.
View source ↗Source history
- Indexed on
- 2026-01-20
- Index updated
- 2026-02-04
- Branch
- main
Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.
GitHub ↗chat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!