Search

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

code-review

Get quality code reviews from Claude Code - PR workflows, review prompts, checklists

hgeldenhuys☆ 2 Repository stars0 Repository forks

Installation

Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.

View source ↗Guides

Skill instructions

Code Review with Claude Code

Get thorough, actionable code reviews from Claude Code for any codebase.

Quick Reference

Review Type When to Use Prompt Pattern
General New features, refactors "Review @file for issues"
Security Auth, data handling "Security review @file"
Performance Hot paths, loops "Performance review @file"
Style Consistency, standards "Style review against @.eslintrc"
Architecture Design decisions "ultrathink about @src/module/"

Review Request Patterns

Basic Review
Review @src/api/users.ts for issues.

Focus on:
- Logic errors
- Edge cases
- Error handling
- Code clarity
Targeted Review
Review @src/auth/login.ts specifically for:
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- Password handling
- Session management

Ignore styling issues.
Comparative Review
Review this change:
@git:diff src/api/

Compare against:
- Our patterns in @src/api/orders.ts
- Best practices for REST APIs

Review Types

Security Review
Security review @src/auth/ @src/api/

Check for:
- Input validation
- SQL injection
- XSS vulnerabilities
- Auth/authz issues
- Secrets exposure
- CSRF protection

Rate each finding: critical/high/medium/low
Performance Review
Performance review @src/services/search.ts

Analyze:
- Time complexity
- Memory usage
- Database queries (N+1?)
- Caching opportunities
- Async patterns
Style Review
Style review @src/components/ against:
@.eslintrc.js
@.prettierrc

Report:
- Naming conventions
- File organization
- Import ordering
- Component patterns
Architecture Review
ultrathink about the architecture of @src/orders/

Evaluate:
- Separation of concerns
- Dependency direction
- Coupling/cohesion
- Testability
- Extensibility

Getting Better Reviews

Provide Context

Include related files and history:

Review @src/api/payments.ts

Context:
- @src/types/payment.ts (types)
- @src/services/stripe.ts (integration)
- This replaces the old PayPal flow
- Must handle refunds within 30 days
Specify Your Concerns
Review @src/auth/session.ts

I'm specifically worried about:
1. Race conditions in token refresh
2. Session fixation attacks
3. Memory leaks from unclosed sessions

Less concerned about:
- Code style (will run linter)
- Test coverage (separate pass)
Request Actionable Feedback
Review @src/utils/parser.ts

For each issue found:
1. Explain the problem
2. Show the problematic code
3. Provide a fix
4. Rate severity

Review Output Format

Request structured output for complex reviews:

Review @src/api/ and format findings as:

## Critical
- [Issue]: [Location]: [Description]

## Improvements
- [Suggestion]: [Location]: [Benefit]

## Questions
- [Question]: [Context]

## Positive
- What's done well

Iterative Reviews

Multi-Pass Approach
# Pass 1: High-level
Review @src/orders/ for architectural issues.
Don't look at implementation details yet.

# Pass 2: After addressing Pass 1
Now review the implementation in @src/orders/service.ts
Focus on business logic correctness.

# Pass 3: Final
Security and performance review of @src/orders/
Review and Fix
Review @src/api/upload.ts for security issues.

For each critical issue:
1. Explain it
2. Fix it immediately
3. Add a test case

Thinking Keywords for Reviews

Keyword Review Type Example
think General review "think about issues in @file"
think harder Edge cases "think harder about edge cases"
ultrathink Security/arch "ultrathink about security of @auth/"
megathink Critical systems "megathink about @payment/ risks"

Review Checklists

Quick prompts for standard checks:

Run through @CHECKLIST.md for @src/api/users.ts

See CHECKLIST.md for complete checklists.

PR-Specific Reviews

Review PR #123

gh pr diff 123

Focus on:
- Does it match the PR description?
- Are tests adequate?
- Any breaking changes?
- Documentation updated?

See PR-WORKFLOWS.md for complete PR review workflows.

Review Comment Templates

Issue Found
Issue: [Brief description]
Location: [file:line]
Severity: [critical|high|medium|low]

Problem:
[Explanation of what's wrong]

Current:
[code snippet]

Suggested:
[fixed code snippet]

Why: [Reason this matters]
Suggestion
Suggestion: [Brief description]
Location: [file:line]
Impact: [performance|readability|maintainability]

Current approach:
[what code does now]

Alternative:
[better approach]

Benefit: [Why this is better]

Common Review Prompts

API Endpoint
Review @src/api/users.ts for:
- Input validation completeness
- Error response consistency
- Auth/authz checks
- Rate limiting consideration
- Logging adequacy
React Component
Review @src/components/UserCard.tsx for:
- Props validation
- Render optimization
- Hook usage
- Accessibility
- Error boundaries
Database Code
Review @src/repositories/user.ts for:
- SQL injection (even with ORM)
- N+1 query patterns
- Transaction handling
- Index usage
- Connection management
Utility Functions
Review @src/utils/validation.ts for:
- Edge case handling
- Type safety
- Error messages clarity
- Reusability
- Test coverage gaps

Reference Files

File Contents
REVIEW-PROMPTS.md Detailed prompts by review type
PR-WORKFLOWS.md Pull request review workflows
CHECKLIST.md Code review checklists

Validation

After a review, verify quality:

  • All critical issues addressed
  • Fixes don't introduce new issues
  • Tests added for bugs found
  • Review comments resolved
  • Code compiles and tests pass

Examples

Read the usage examples in the source repository.

View source ↗

Source history

Indexed on
2026-01-20
Index updated
2026-01-26
Branch
main

Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!