pr-review-agent
PR 코드 리뷰, 개선 제안, 자동 머지 에이전트. 코드 품질, 테스트, 보안 검사 통합.
Discover tools code quality skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
PR 코드 리뷰, 개선 제안, 자동 머지 에이전트. 코드 품질, 테스트, 보안 검사 통합.
코드 품질 검사 자동화. 린트, 포맷, 타입 체크, 보안 스캔 통합.
Performs comprehensive code review on git diffs and generates review.md with quality scores, critical issues, performance concerns, and potential bugs. Use when user requests to review changes, check code quali...
Use these when you want low-noise lint/test output (good for LLM/CI logs) while staying aligned with repo policy.
Reviews code changes for bugs, style issues, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code quality, or validating changes before commit.
Run preflight checks and produce actionable install guidance for missing tools.
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
Generate nested AGENTS.md coding guidelines per module (monorepo-aware), detect languages/tooling, ask architecture preferences, and set up missing formatters/linters (Spotless for JVM). Use when the user wants...
Performs a fast, focused code review checking for common issues, security vulnerabilities, and best practices without over-engineering. Optimized for cost-efficiency by targeting specific concerns rather than b...
Provides code review expertise with constructive feedback. Use when conducting self-reviews before PR creation, quality checks, or best practice validation.
Enforces thorough code analysis with all entry points, complete flow tracing, architectural reasoning, and consumption tracking
Comprehensive full-stack codebase audit for Crispy CRM. Triggers on audit, deep audit, codebase review, quality check, after refactoring, new feature complete. Phased approach (Critical > Improvements > Polish)...
Use when receiving or giving code review feedback, implementing review suggestions, addressing PR comments, or evaluating technical suggestions. Covers both directions - receiving feedback (verify before implem...
Review pull requests for code quality, security, and conventions. Use when reviewing PRs or preparing code for review.
Use when writing Python code for clean, performant, and idiomatic implementations
Use when reviewing code for architectural consistency, designing backend systems, or evaluating structural changes
Use when reviewing code for quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices
Input validation patterns for the .NET 8 WPF widget host app. Use when implementing form validation, data annotations, command can-execute logic, and error display in MVVM ViewModels.
Establish enterprise-grade code quality baselines for the .NET solution: analyzers, nullability, formatting, complexity limits, and review-ready diffs. Use when changing production code, refactoring, or introdu...
Run project verification checks (type-check, lint, unit tests, e2e tests, build). Use this skill when the user asks to verify the project, run checks, or validate code quality.
Code review checkpoint for conductor gates. Calls codex/review MCP tool to analyze code changes. Returns structured result with pass/fail status, issues found, and whether visual QA is needed.
Review code changes with automated quality checks and confidence-based filtering
Documentation check checkpoint for conductor gates. Analyzes code changes to determine if documentation needs updating. Returns structured result with pass/fail status and documentation suggestions.
Guides development, updates, and refactoring across the entire MCP server codebase. Use when adding features, updating categories, refactoring code, checking test coverage, or making any code changes. Enforces...
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.