receiving-code-review
Process external code review feedback systematically. Use when responding to PR comments, review feedback, or technical suggestions from reviewers.
Discover tools code quality skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Process external code review feedback systematically. Use when responding to PR comments, review feedback, or technical suggestions from reviewers.
Use when reviewing code quality, before refactoring, when complexity increases, when code feels "hard to change", during code review, or when onboarding to unfamiliar code - systematic identification of code sm...
Automatically invoked when analyzing code quality, refactoring, or maintainability. Triggers on mentions of "code smell", "refactor", "code quality", "technical debt", "complexity", "maintainability", "clean co...
AI agent handles code review feedback professionally by categorizing, responding appropriately, and extracting learnings. Use when PR feedback arrives, addressing reviewer comments, or improving from feedback.
AI agent identifies and fixes common testing anti-patterns that lead to flaky, slow, or unmaintainable test suites. Use when reviewing tests, debugging test failures, or improving test quality.
Enforce project hygiene throughout the PR lifecycle. Use before creating PRs to validate worktrees, branch naming, and issue linking. Use when creating PRs to ensure proper "Fixes
Run multiple linters (eslint, oxlint, tsc, biome) in parallel with unified JSON output. Use when linting code, checking for errors before commits, or debugging lint failures. Triggers on "lint", "check code", "...
Review code for quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices compliance
Python type hints, type checking, and static analysis with mypy
Process and resolve GitHub Copilot automated PR review comments. Use when the user says "check copilot review", "handle copilot comments", "resolve copilot feedback", "address copilot suggestions", or mentions...
Use when writing Rails models - enforces state-as-records not booleans, concerns as adjectives namespaced under model, invocation ordering, and private indentation
Obsidian 플러그인 코드가 공식 가이드라인을 준수하는지 검토하고 개선점을 제안한다. Use when: - 사용자가 Obsidian 플러그인 가이드라인 준수 여부를 확인하고 싶을 때 - 플러그인을 커뮤니티 스토어에 제출하기 전 검토...
Review code for quality, style, and potential issues. Use when code has been written or modified, when user asks for code review, or when TDD autonomous mode needs quality assessment. Supports configurable stri...
mypy - Static type checker for Python with gradual typing, strict mode, Protocol support, and framework integration
Test quality inspection framework for reviewing test coverage, identifying gaps, and ensuring comprehensive validation. Use when reviewing test suites, performing QA inspections, or establishing testing quality...
Initialize Rails coding conventions for a project by detecting dependencies and copying matching rules with examples to .claude/rules/hustler-rails/. Use when setting up Rails conventions for a new project or u...
Engineering standards and code governance enforcement. Triggers during code review discussions, PR descriptions, commit preparation, and when discussing code quality. Ensures compliance with standards.md and ru...
Laravel品質チェック。Pest/Larastan/Pint実行時に使用。「Laravelの品質チェック」「Laravel テスト」で起動。
Python品質チェック。pytest/mypy/Black実行時に使用。「Pythonの品質チェック」「静的解析」で起動。
TypeScript品質チェック。型チェック/ESLint/テスト実行時に使用。「TSの品質チェック」「型チェック」で起動。
最終的な品質検証を行う。テスト/カバレッジ/静的解析/quality-gateをチェック。REFACTORの次フェーズ。「レビューして」「review」で起動。
JavaScript品質チェック。ESLint/Prettier/Jest実行時に使用。「JSの品質チェック」「静的解析」で起動。
PHP品質チェック。PHPStan/Pint/PHPUnit実行時に使用。「PHPの品質チェック」「静的解析」で起動。
Hugo品質チェック。ビルド/リンクチェック/テンプレート解析時に使用。「Hugoの品質チェック」「ビルド検証」で起動。
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.