code-scoring
Provides quantitative rubrics and criteria for scoring code quality on a 1-10 scale. Use when reviewing code, performing code audits, establishing quality baselines, comparing implementations, or providing obje...
Discover tools code quality skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Provides quantitative rubrics and criteria for scoring code quality on a 1-10 scale. Use when reviewing code, performing code audits, establishing quality baselines, comparing implementations, or providing obje...
Comprehensive codebase review and parallel agent-based remediation skill. Use PROACTIVELY when agent needs to perform full codebase audit, generate master findings report with quantified metrics, and execute re...
Fixes TypeScript type safety issues including unsafe member access, assignments, returns, calls, and arguments. Use when encountering @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-* errors or when working with unknown/any types...
Identifies code smells, applies design patterns, guides migrations, and performs security/performance/accessibility refactoring. Use when improving code quality, modernizing codebases, applying design patterns,...
Evaluates codebase architecture for patterns, anti-patterns, coupling, cohesion, scalability, and technical debt. Use when assessing system design, reviewing architecture decisions, identifying improvement area...
Review Rust code for idiomatic patterns, best practices, and production quality. Use when reviewing Rust crates, checking code quality, or before committing Rust changes.
Enforce code style and formatting preferences. Use when writing or reviewing code to ensure consistent style.
Review code for Effect-TS patterns, common issues, and project conventions. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code quality, or before committing changes.
Run code hygiene checks before committing. Use before git commits or when asked to check code quality.
Detect and simplify overly complex code. Apply KISS principle - less is more.
Comprehensive code review with multi-agent analysis. Checks security, performance, maintainability, tests.
Guide safe, incremental refactoring that improves code quality without changing behavior.
TypeScript best practices expert. PROACTIVELY use when working with TypeScript/JavaScript files. Triggers: .ts, .tsx, .js, .jsx files, type errors, ESLint issues, strict mode
Fix lint, formatting, and prose issues in markdown files using Prettier and Vale. Use when the user or agent needs to fix lint, formatting, and prose issues in markdown files.
Code review checklist for SwiftUI and Swift PRs. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, verifying Swift/SwiftUI implementations, or conducting PR reviews. Provides prioritized checklist coveri...
Code review workflow using GitHub CLI. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking PR diffs, adding review comments, or approving/requesting changes on PRs.
Guide for security tooling (analyzers, fuzzers, decompilers, compilers) and consistent placement in README.md.
Critical rules and best practices for working with markdown files.
Use for code review - runs all reviewers in parallel on uncommitted changes
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
Code readability review based on "The Art of Readable Code" and Miller's Law (7±2). Use when reviewing code clarity, improving naming, or when user mentions 可読性, 理解しやすい, わかりやすい, 明確, 命名, 変数...
Use when running verification pipelines, checking test/lint/type status, or ensuring code quality gates pass before completing work
Perform a code review on recent changes
Pre-commit validation ensuring lint and tests pass
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.