quality-fix-formatting
Automatically fix code formatting issues using mojo format, markdownlint, and pre-commit hooks. Use when formatting checks fail or before committing code.
Discover tools code quality skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Automatically fix code formatting issues using mojo format, markdownlint, and pre-commit hooks. Use when formatting checks fail or before committing code.
Perform a meticulous deep code audit covering Security, Logic, Completeness, and Quality. Manual analysis for critical systems.
Load project context including coding guidelines, styling rules, and folder structure before starting work.
Run J-Star code review on staged changes. Analyze, fix P0/P1 issues, and iterate until clean.
Expert code reviewer specializing in code quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices across multiple languages. Masters static analysis, design patterns, and performance optimization with focus on ma...
Enforce KISS, Purity, SOLID, and Let It Crash principles through mandatory validation gates. Detects complexity violations, impure functions, design anti-patterns, and error handling issues.
Comprehensive code analysis, quality assessment, and issue diagnosis. Use when analyzing code quality, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, architecture reviews, or troubleshooting bugs and build...
Strict Test-Driven Development enforcer with Red-Green-Refactor workflow automation. Auto-detects frameworks, validates semantic test failures, and blocks production code until tests fail properly. Use for feat...
Detects project type, package manager, and monorepo structure. Returns correct commands for test/build/lint/dev. Run at project initialization and cache results in state. Use before running any build/test comma...
Analyze Ruby and Rails code quality with RubyCritic. Identifies code smells, complexity issues, and refactoring opportunities. Provides detailed metrics, scores files A-F, compares branches, and prioritizes hig...
Format code according to project standards and fix linting issues
epistemic standards for evaluation and analysis. load before reviewing code, debugging, reporting findings, or any task where claims must be defensible. enforces trace-or-delete, confidence labeling, falsificat...
Writes high-quality Rust code following yttrium project standards. Use when working on Rust codebases, creating new modules, or reviewing Rust code quality.
mypy - Static type checker for Python with gradual typing, strict mode, Protocol support, and framework integration
PR quality checklist for ensuring comprehensive, well-documented pull requests. Use before submitting PRs to improve review efficiency and code quality.
Pyright fast Python type checker from Microsoft with VS Code integration and strict type checking modes
Biome - Fast all-in-one toolchain for web projects (linter + formatter in Rust, 100x faster than ESLint)
Comprehensive code review for security, performance, and maintainability. Activates when asked to "review code", "check this code", "audit", "find bugs", "security review", or when reviewing PRs or diffs.
Configure and use automated code quality tools (ruff, mypy, pre-commit) for scientific Python projects. Use when setting up linting, formatting, type checking, or automated quality gates. Ideal for enforcing co...
Detect patterns, anomalies, and trends in code and data. Use when identifying code smells, finding security vulnerabilities, or discovering recurring patterns. Handles regex patterns, AST analysis, and statisti...
Conduct thorough, constructive code reviews for quality and security. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, identifying bugs, or auditing security. Handles best practices, SOLID principles, s...
Run a final release checklist before shipping. Verifies no TODOs, no debug code, docs updated, tests passing, dependencies justified, and security reviewed.
Install the pre-commit review hook that forces you to understand changes before committing. Use when you want to enable commit reviews or when setting up a new project.
Review code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use when reviewing staged changes, pull requests, or specific files before merging.
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.