commit-helper
Intelligent commit message generation following conventional commit format.
Discover tools code quality skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Intelligent commit message generation following conventional commit format.
Comprehensive pre-deployment validation ensuring code is production-ready. Runs complete audit pipeline, performance benchmarks, security scan, documentation check, and generates deployment checklist.
Auto-invoke when reviewing JSX with interactive elements, forms, buttons, or navigation. Enforces WCAG compliance and inclusive design.
Audits code against CI/CD style rules, quality guidelines, and best practices, then rewrites code to meet standards without breaking functionality. Use this skill after functionality validation to ensure code i...
Detect accidentally committed secrets, credentials, and sensitive information in code.
Automated code review and security linting integration for CI/CD pipelines using reviewdog. Aggregates findings from multiple security and quality tools (SAST, linters, formatters) into unified code review comm...
GitHub PR utilities for code review workflows
Maintain consistent code formatting, naming conventions, type safety, and automated code quality standards across PHP and TypeScript/JavaScript. Use this skill when writing or editing any PHP files (.php), Type...
Pattern for testing your own code during implementation. Ensures quality before declaring complete.
Deep architectural audit focused on finding dead code, duplicated functionality, architectural anti-patterns, type confusion, and code smells. Use when user asks for architectural analysis, find dead code, iden...
Use this skill when user asks to "review code", "check for issues", "analyze code quality", "find bugs", or wants feedback on code implementation.
Review documentation changes for compliance with the Metabase writing style guide. Use when reviewing pull requests, files, or diffs containing documentation markdown files.
Git commit quality and conventional commits expertise with automatic issue tracking integration. Auto-invokes when the user explicitly asks about commit message format, commit quality, conventional commits, com...
Assesses and responds to incoming code review feedback on PRs (reviewer comments, requested changes), especially when suggestions are unclear, technically questionable, or scope-expanding. Use before implementi...
Auto-invoke when reviewing try/catch blocks, API error responses, async operations, or user feedback patterns. Enforces graceful degradation and meaningful error messages.
Prevents shortcuts and cheating when completing tasks. Blocks commits with warning suppressions, commented tests, or deleted assertions.
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate impleme...
Check code against security compliance standards and best practices.
Identify unused code, imports, variables, and functions for safe removal.
Guide for code conventions and formatting
Reviews code for quality, security, performance, and accessibility issues. Use when user mentions レビュー, review, コードレビュー, セキュリティ, パフォーマンス, 品質チェック, セルフレビュー, PR, diff, 変更確認...
Analyzes code for style consistency and applies project-specific formatting conventions beyond what linters catch. Use when reviewing code, ensuring style consistency, or when user requests code style improveme...
Automated code review with best practices, security checks, and quality standards.
Provides TypeScript patterns for type-first development, making illegal states unrepresentable, exhaustive handling, and runtime validation. Must use when reading or writing TypeScript/JavaScript files.
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.