Discover content media code quality skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Writes, reviews, and refactors Python code following modern best practices. Specialises in Python 3.12+, uv for project management, type hints, polars over pandas, pydantic for validation, and pytest for testin...
Validate quality with multi-agent review, auto-fix issues, generate organized commits, and create PRs with rich context. Use after completing features to ensure quality gates pass and ship confidently.
JavaScript and TypeScript best practices covering naming conventions, control flow, state management, TypeScript patterns (avoid any/enum, prefer type over interface), safety (input validation, assertions, erro...
Rust 反模式与常见错误。处理代码审查、clone、unwrap、String 用法、迭代器等问题。触发词：anti-pattern, common mistake, clone, unwrap, code review, 代码异味, 常见错误, 代码审查, refactor, 重构
Rust 编码规范专家。处理命名, 格式化, 注释, clippy, rustfmt, lint, 代码风格, 最佳实践, naming convention, 代码审查, P.NAM, G.FMT, 怎么命名, 代码规范
Creates and reviews CLAUDE.md configuration files for Claude Code. Applies HumanLayer guidelines including instruction budgets (~50 user-level, ~100 project-level), WHAT/WHY/HOW framework, and progressive discl...
Analyze test coverage, identify gaps, detect dead code, and improve test quality. Use when user asks to check coverage, review tests, find untested code, or improve test robustness.
Verify code implementation aligns with design specifications. Use after implementing features, during code reviews, or when refactoring to ensure architectural compliance. Compares design docs with actual code.
Monitor and refactor large files into smaller, AI-friendly modules. Use when user asks to check file sizes, split large files, or organize the codebase. Ensures tests pass before and after refactoring.
This skill should be used when reviewing or auditing existing CSS code for consistency with established patterns. Triggers on "review CSS", "audit styles", "check CSS", "validate stylesheet", "CSS review". Chec...
Format commit messages according to Grey Haven Studio's actual commitlint configuration (100 char header, lowercase subject, conventional commits). Use when creating git commits or reviewing commit messages.
6-phase verification system ensuring code matches documentation with automated alignment scoring (signature, type, behavior, error, example checks). Reduces onboarding friction 40%. Use when verifying code-docs...
Apply Grey Haven Studio's TypeScript/React and Python/FastAPI coding standards from production templates. Use when writing code, reviewing PRs, fixing linting errors, formatting files, or when the user mentions...
Multi-mode code quality analysis covering security reviews (OWASP Top 10), clarity refactoring (readability rules), and synthesis analysis (cross-file issues). Use when reviewing code for security vulnerabiliti...
Comprehensive Claude Code plugin auditing skill for validating structure, detecting deprecated patterns, and recommending best practices based on the latest changelog. Use when auditing plugins, checking for de...
Write TypeScript code following best practices. Use when developing TypeScript/JavaScript applications. Covers type safety, patterns, and tooling.
Validate TypeScript/JavaScript code quality with ESLint, Prettier, type checking, and security analysis. Use for TypeScript/JS codebases to ensure code quality and standards.
Validate Python code quality with formatting, type checking, linting, and security analysis. Use for Python codebases to ensure PEP 8 compliance, type safety, and code quality.
Validate Rust code quality with rustfmt, clippy, cargo check, and security analysis. Use for Rust codebases to ensure idiomatic Rust code and best practices.
Validate code quality, test coverage, performance, and security. Use when verifying implemented features meet all standards and requirements before marking complete.
Validate code quality, test coverage, performance, and security. Use when verifying implemented features meet all standards and requirements before marking complete.
Review code for quality, security, and performance with comprehensive feedback.
Self-review PR changes against project conventions before creating PR. Use when: (1) before creating a pull request, (2) after completing feature implementation, (3) when asked to review changes, (4) running '/...
Review code changes on a feature branch compared to a base branch (default: master). Checks for pattern consistency, code duplication, unnecessary variables, and proper use of existing utilities. Use when you w...
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.