reviewing-test
Generic code review for test code. Use as part of parallel test review execution.
Discover content media code quality skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Generic code review for test code. Use as part of parallel test review execution.
Reviews Burn deep learning code for idiomatic patterns, performance, backend portability, and best practices. Use when asked for code review, refactoring suggestions, or "is this idiomatic".
Detect and fix violations of project instructions defined in .claude/rules/. Use when checking code compliance, reviewing changes, or when the user asks about instruction violations.
Run configuration handling for persistent command configuration storage
Java code maintenance standards including prioritization, refactoring triggers, and compliance verification
Standards for identifying, prioritizing, and verifying JavaScript code maintenance and refactoring work
General documentation standards for README, AsciiDoc, and technical documentation with validation, formatting, link verification, and content review workflows
Core JavaScript development standards covering ES modules, modern patterns, code quality, async programming, and tooling
ESLint, Prettier, and StyleLint configuration standards for JavaScript code quality and formatting, including flat config setup, rule management, and build integration
Runs local validation operations for any project. Auto-detects language/framework and runs linting, type checking, tests, and dead code detection. Use this when the user says "validate", "run validation", "chec...
Reviews code for security vulnerabilities, identifies security issues, suggests improvements
Analyzes codebase, searches documentation, investigates dependencies and architecture patterns
Use when creating git commits to ensure commit messages follow project standards. Applies the 7 rules for great commit messages with focus on conciseness and imperative mood.
Comprehensive code review skill for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Swift, Kotlin, Go. Includes automated code analysis, best practice checking, security scanning, and review checklist generation. Use when revi...
Code review using reviewer agent. Thorough analysis of code quality, security, and best practices.
Checklist for editing training code. Trigger when: (1) modifying training notebook, (2) changing GPUEnvConfig, (3) changing reward functions, (4) ANY training-related code changes.
Audit Jupyter notebooks for hardcoded values that contradict configuration cells. Trigger when: (1) notebook behavior differs from documented settings, (2) updating notebook version, (3) finding inconsistent va...
Review and apply GitHub Copilot suggestions on pull requests. Trigger when reviewing PRs with Copilot suggestions.
Reviews code changes for bugs, style issues, performance problems, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code quality, or auditing existing code.
Code review patterns, testing, and pre-commit quality gates
Audit code compliance with AGENTS.md project guidelines. Checks adherence to project conventions, naming, patterns, and standards. Read-only analysis. Use before PR. Triggers: review agents.md adherence, check...
Comprehensive code review orchestrator. Runs multiple focused review analyses (bugs, types, maintainability, simplicity, coverage, docs, AGENTS.md) and consolidates findings. Use before PR or after implementati...
Audit code for bugs, logic errors, race conditions, and edge cases. Read-only analysis producing actionable report. Use before PR, after implementation, or when debugging. Triggers: review bugs, find bugs, chec...
Audit code for DRY violations, dead code, complexity, and consistency issues. Read-only analysis with actionable recommendations. Use before PR or for code quality review. Triggers: review maintainability, code...
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.