experiential-wisdom-inquiry
Inquire into experiential wisdom patterns and lessons learned.
Discover blockchain philosophy ethics skills, compare source repositories and read the instructions for each workflow.
Inquire into experiential wisdom patterns and lessons learned.
Resolve conflicts between competing values through structured pluralistic analysis.
Analyze multiple cognitive perspectives to identify consensus and divergence patterns.
View yourself as an entity with infinite dimensions rather than a single good/bad identity. Strengths and weaknesses are often the same trait in different contexts. Use during performance reviews or when receiv...
Strategic life direction through reflective dialogue and decision frameworks. Use when exploring life direction, values, or meaning; facing significant decisions (career, family, major life changes); feeling st...
This skill should be used when users question their philosophical stance, their language contradicts their declared epistemology, they are moving between stages and want to verify coherence, mentions 'assumptio...
This skill should be used when patterns seem contradictory but both feel true, user is stuck in either/or thinking, theoretical and empirical streams seem irreconcilable, or user mentions 'paradox', 'tension',...
You MUST use this when reviewing completed sermons, Bible teachings, or theological content. Use when users ask you to evaluate, critique, or assess biblical faithfulness of teaching material. Acts as a skeptic...
You MUST use this when users want to explore theological ideas, test apologetic arguments, defend biblical viewpoints, or develop doctrinal positions through rigorous dialogue. Use when users indicate they want...
Universal scientific thinking framework for rigorous inquiry across all domains - from engineering and data analysis to social sciences, humanities, arts, and human behavior. Use when approaching problems syste...
Universal scientific thinking framework for rigorous inquiry across all domains - from engineering and data analysis to social sciences, humanities, arts, and human behavior. Use when approaching problems syste...
Zero Framework Cognition Principles
Advanced multi-agent reasoning system for complex questions requiring maximum accuracy. Uses adaptive technique selection, adversarial validation, multi-agent debate, and deep analysis. Trigger phrases "ai boar...
從未知領域到專業的系統化學習方法論
Frank's personalized spiritual development and meaning-making
AI agent that forges the foundations of your Soulbook - building habits, systems, and structures across all 7 Pillars
Values, purpose, and character foundation - The anchor for all decisions
Problem-solving strategies for proof theory in mathematical logic
Philosophical/meta project analysis - critical analysis framework that asks "why?"
Elevates thinking for complex problems with intellectual honesty. Activates deep analysis while avoiding performative contrarianism. Use when facing decisions that deserve more than the first answer, require tr...
Formal constraint theory unifying deontic logic (P/O/F/I operators), Juarrero's trichotomy (enabling/governing/constitutive), Hohfeldian rights (claim-duty, privilege-noright, power-liability, immunity-disabili...
Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's...
純粋定理 P2: 純粋意志 (I-P)。Flow×Value のみの最も抽象的な意志機能。 Use when: 目標設定、価値判断、「何を望むか」を問う時。 Triggers: M2 Krisis(具体化), M4 Phronēsis(戦略化) Keywords: pure-will, goal-settin...
純粋定理 P3: 純粋探求 (A-E)。Flow×Value のみの最も抽象的な探求機能。 Use when: 問いかけ、探索、「何を調べるか」を問う時。 Triggers: M5 Peira(具体化), M7 Dokimē(検証化) Keywords: pure-inquiry, questioning, s...
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.