test-driven-development
Write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass
Installation
Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.
View source ↗GuidesSkill instructions
Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Overview
Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.
Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
This skill enforces strict test-first development following the RED/GREEN/REFACTOR cycle. Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.
When to Use This Skill
Always:
- New features
- Bug fixes
- Refactoring
- Behavior changes
Exceptions (ask human partner):
- Throwaway prototypes
- Generated code
- Configuration files
Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.
The Iron Law
NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.
No exceptions:
- Don't keep it as "reference"
- Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
- Delete means delete
Core Principles
- RED: Write a failing test first
- GREEN: Write minimal code to make test pass
- REFACTOR: Improve code while keeping tests green
- NEVER: Write implementation before tests
Quick Start
The RED/GREEN/REFACTOR Cycle
RED → Verify RED → GREEN → Verify GREEN → REFACTOR → Repeat
- RED: Write one minimal test showing desired behavior
- Verify RED: Run test, confirm it fails for right reason
- GREEN: Write simplest code to pass test
- Verify GREEN: Run test, confirm it passes
- REFACTOR: Clean up while keeping tests green
- Repeat: Next test for next feature
Cycle Details
RED: Write one minimal test (one behavior, clear name, real code) Verify RED: MANDATORY - watch it fail for right reason GREEN: Write simplest code to pass (no extras) Verify GREEN: MANDATORY - watch it pass, all tests pass REFACTOR: Clean up while keeping tests green (optional)
Navigation
For detailed information:
- Workflow: Complete RED/GREEN/REFACTOR workflow with detailed examples
- Examples: Real-world TDD scenarios with step-by-step walkthroughs
- Philosophy: Why order matters and why tests-after don't work
- Anti-patterns: Common mistakes, rationalizations, and red flags
- Integration: Using TDD with debugging and other skills
Key Reminders
- ALWAYS write the test BEFORE implementation
- Make each test fail FIRST to verify it's testing something
- Keep implementation minimal - just enough to pass tests
- Refactor only when tests are green
- One cycle at a time - small steps
- If test passes immediately, it's not testing new behavior
Red Flags - STOP and Start Over
If you catch yourself:
- Writing code before test
- Test passes immediately
- Can't explain why test failed
- "I'll test after"
- "Keep as reference"
- "Already spent X hours, deleting is wasteful"
- "Tests after achieve the same purpose"
ALL of these mean: Delete code. Start over with TDD.
Why Order Matters
Tests-after pass immediately (proves nothing), test-first fail then pass (proves it works). See Philosophy for detailed explanation.
Integration with Other Skills
- systematic-debugging: Create failing test in Phase 4 (bug reproduction)
- verification-before-completion: Verify tests exist and watched them fail
- defense-in-depth: Add validation tests after implementing feature
Real-World Impact
From TDD practice:
- Test-first: 95%+ first-time correctness
- Test-after: 40% first-time correctness
- TDD time: 25-45 minutes per feature (including tests)
- Non-TDD time: 15 minutes coding + 60-120 minutes debugging
TDD is pragmatic - finds bugs before commit, prevents regressions, documents behavior, enables refactoring.
Examples
Read the usage examples in the source repository.
View source ↗Source history
- Indexed on
- 2026-01-20
- Index updated
- 2026-01-28
- Branch
- main
Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.
GitHub ↗chat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!