model-explainer
Model interpretability and explainability using SHAP, LIME, feature importance, and partial dependence plots. Activates for "explain model", "model interpretability", "SHAP", "LIME", "feature importance", "why prediction", "model explanation". Generates human-readable explanations for model predictions, critical for trust, debugging, and regulatory compliance.
Installation
Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.
View source ↗GuidesSkill instructions
Model Explainer
Overview
Makes black-box models interpretable. Explains why models make specific predictions, which features matter most, and how features interact. Critical for trust, debugging, and regulatory compliance.
Why Explainability Matters
- Trust: Stakeholders trust models they understand
- Debugging: Find model weaknesses and biases
- Compliance: GDPR, fair lending laws require explanations
- Improvement: Understand what to improve
- Safety: Detect when model might fail
Explanation Types
1. Global Explanations (Model-Level)
Feature Importance:
from specweave import explain_model
explainer = explain_model(
model=trained_model,
X_train=X_train,
increment="0042"
)
# Global feature importance
importance = explainer.feature_importance()
Output:
Top Features (Global):
1. transaction_amount (importance: 0.35)
2. user_history_days (importance: 0.22)
3. merchant_reputation (importance: 0.18)
4. time_since_last_transaction (importance: 0.15)
5. device_type (importance: 0.10)
Partial Dependence Plots:
# How does feature affect prediction?
explainer.partial_dependence(feature="transaction_amount")
2. Local Explanations (Prediction-Level)
SHAP Values:
# Explain single prediction
explanation = explainer.explain_prediction(X_sample)
Output:
Prediction: FRAUD (probability: 0.92)
Why?
+ transaction_amount=5000 → +0.45 (high amount increases fraud risk)
+ user_history_days=2 → +0.30 (new user increases risk)
+ merchant_reputation=low → +0.25 (suspicious merchant)
- time_since_last_transaction=1hr → -0.08 (recent activity normal)
Base prediction: 0.10
Final prediction: 0.92
LIME Explanations:
# Local interpretable model
lime_exp = explainer.lime_explanation(X_sample)
Usage in SpecWeave
from specweave import ModelExplainer
# Create explainer
explainer = ModelExplainer(
model=model,
X_train=X_train,
feature_names=feature_names,
increment="0042"
)
# Generate all explanations
explainer.generate_all_reports()
# Creates:
# - feature-importance.png
# - shap-summary.png
# - pdp-plots/
# - local-explanations/
# - explainability-report.md
Real-World Examples
Example 1: Fraud Detection
# Explain why transaction flagged as fraud
transaction = {
"amount": 5000,
"user_age_days": 2,
"merchant": "new_merchant_xyz"
}
explanation = explainer.explain(transaction)
print(explanation.to_text())
Output:
FRAUD ALERT (92% confidence)
Main factors:
1. Large transaction amount ($5000) - Very unusual for new users
2. Account only 2 days old - Fraud pattern
3. Merchant has low reputation score - Red flag
If this is legitimate:
- User should verify identity
- Merchant should be manually reviewed
Example 2: Loan Approval
# Explain loan rejection
applicant = {
"income": 45000,
"credit_score": 620,
"debt_ratio": 0.45
}
explanation = explainer.explain(applicant)
print(explanation.to_text())
Output:
LOAN DENIED
Main reasons:
1. Credit score (620) below threshold (650) - Primary factor
2. High debt-to-income ratio (45%) - Risk indicator
3. Income ($45k) adequate but not strong
To improve approval chances:
- Increase credit score by 30+ points
- Reduce debt-to-income ratio below 40%
Regulatory Compliance
GDPR "Right to Explanation"
# Generate GDPR-compliant explanation
gdpr_explanation = explainer.gdpr_explanation(prediction)
# Includes:
# - Decision rationale
# - Data used
# - How to contest decision
# - Impact of features
Fair Lending Act
# Check for bias in protected attributes
bias_report = explainer.fairness_report(
sensitive_features=["gender", "race", "age"]
)
# Detects:
# - Disparate impact
# - Feature bias
# - Recommendations for fairness
Visualization Types
- Feature Importance Bar Chart
- SHAP Summary Plot (beeswarm)
- SHAP Waterfall (single prediction)
- Partial Dependence Plots
- Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE)
- Force Plots (interactive)
- Decision Trees (surrogate models)
Integration with SpecWeave
# Generate all explainability artifacts
/ml:explain-model 0042
# Explain specific prediction
/ml:explain-prediction --increment 0042 --sample sample.json
# Check for bias
/ml:fairness-check 0042
Explainability artifacts automatically included in increment documentation and COMPLETION-SUMMARY.
Best Practices
- Generate explanations for all production models - No "black boxes" in production
- Check for bias - Test sensitive attributes
- Document limitations - What model can't explain
- Validate explanations - Do they make domain sense?
- Make explanations accessible - Non-technical stakeholders should understand
Model explainability is non-negotiable for responsible AI deployment.
Examples
Read the usage examples in the source repository.
View source ↗Source history
- Indexed on
- 2026-01-20
- Index updated
- 2026-01-28
- Branch
- main
Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.
GitHub ↗chat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!