Search

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

epistemic-checkpoint

Force verification before answering questions involving versions, dates, status, or "current" state. Prevents hallucinations at the REASONING level by checking assertions.yaml and WebSearch before forming beliefs. Triggers on software versions, release status, dates, and package versions.

aiskillstore☆ 124 Repository stars6 Repository forks

Installation

Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.

View source ↗Guides

Skill instructions

Epistemic Checkpoint

Force verification before answering questions involving versions, dates, status, or "current" state.

Purpose

Prevents the ROOT CAUSE of hallucinations - not just blocking wrong output, but preventing wrong REASONING. Claude's training data is stale; this skill forces verification before forming beliefs.

Triggers

Activate this skill when the question involves ANY of:

  • Software versions (.NET, Node, React, Python, etc.)
  • Release status (preview, LTS, GA, RC, deprecated)
  • "Current" or "latest" anything
  • Dates that might be after training cutoff
  • Package versions
  • API deprecations

MANDATORY Protocol

Step 1: Recognize Uncertainty

Say to yourself: "My training data may be stale for: [topic]"

Step 2: Check Local Ground Truth
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/blackboard/assertions.yaml
Search for relevant entries

If found - use that value with high confidence.

Step 3: If Not in Assertions - WebSearch
WebSearch("[software] [version] release date site:official-docs")
WebSearch("[software] LTS release 2025")

Prefer official sources:

  • microsoft.com/dotnet for .NET
  • nodejs.org for Node
  • python.org for Python
Step 4: State Verified Facts

Say: "Based on [source], [software] [version] is [status] as of [date]."

Step 5: THEN Proceed

Only now answer the actual question with the verified baseline.

Red Flag Thoughts (REJECT THESE)

If you think... Actually do...
"I'm pretty sure .NET 10 is..." WebSearch to verify
"This is probably still preview" Check assertions.yaml
"I remember this from training" Training is stale, verify
"This is a simple factual question" Simple facts are often WRONG
"The user said it's preview" User might be wrong too, verify

Anti-Pattern Examples

WRONG:

"If targeting .NET 10 preview, use C# 14 extension types..."

CORRECT:

"Let me verify .NET 10 status... [WebSearch] ...
.NET 10 is LTS (released November 2025), not preview.
Standard extension methods work fine."

WRONG:

"React 19 is still in beta, so..."

CORRECT:

"Checking React 19 status... [WebSearch] ...
React 19 was released December 2024 as stable.
Proceeding with React 19 stable patterns."

Common Danger Patterns

Topic Danger Pattern Likely Truth
.NET "preview", "not released" .NET 10 LTS since Nov 2025
React "beta", "experimental" React 19 stable since Dec 2024
Node "current" without version Always specify exact version
Python "3.x is latest" Verify - 3.13+ exists

Output Format

When this skill activates, structure your verification as:

Epistemic Checkpoint

Claim to verify: [what you were about to assume]
Source checked: [assertions.yaml / WebSearch / official docs]
Verified fact: [the actual truth]
Confidence: [high/medium/low]

Proceeding with verified baseline...

Examples

Read the usage examples in the source repository.

View source ↗

Source history

Indexed on
2026-01-20
Index updated
2026-01-28
Branch
main

Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!