Rechercher

PythonReactSEOPDF
OpenClaw

first-principles-decomposer

Break any problem down to fundamental truths, then rebuild solutions from atoms up. Use when user says "firstp", "first principles", "from scratch", "what are we assuming", "break this down", "atomic", "fundamental truth", "physics thinking", "Elon method", "bedrock", "ground up", "core problem", "strip away", or challenges assumptions about how things are done.

artyomx330 installations selon la source☆ 0 Étoiles du dépôt

Installation

Suivez les instructions du dépôt pour votre agent. Consultez les fichiers et dépendances avant l’installation.

SkillHub CLI

skillhub install artyomx33/first-principles-decomposer

Examinez la source et la compatibilité, puis suivez les étapes d’installation.

Donnez le lien à votre agent et demandez-lui d’examiner instructions et dépendances avant d’expliquer les étapes.

Voir la source ↗Guides

Instructions

First Principles Decomposer

When To Use

  • Designing new products or features
  • Feeling stuck on a complex problem
  • Existing solutions seem overcomplicated
  • Need to challenge assumptions
  • Starting any new project or initiative

The Process

Phase 1: Identify Assumptions

Ask: "What am I assuming to be true that might not be?" List every assumption embedded in the current approach.

Phase 2: Break to Atoms

For each assumption, ask: "What is the most fundamental truth here?" Keep asking "why?" until you hit bedrock facts.

Phase 3: Rebuild From Truth

Starting ONLY from verified fundamentals, ask: "What's the simplest solution that addresses the core need?"

Interactive Flow

When user invokes this skill:

  1. Clarify the problem (1-2 questions max)
  2. Surface assumptions - list what's being taken for granted
  3. Decompose to fundamentals - show the atomic truths
  4. Rebuild solution - construct from ground up
  5. Compare - show how this differs from conventional approach

Output Format

PROBLEM: [stated problem]

ASSUMPTIONS IDENTIFIED:
1. [assumption] → Challenge: [why this might be wrong]
2. [assumption] → Challenge: [why this might be wrong]

FUNDAMENTAL TRUTHS:
• [bedrock fact 1]
• [bedrock fact 2]
• [bedrock fact 3]

REBUILT SOLUTION:
[New approach built only from fundamentals]

VS CONVENTIONAL:
[How this differs from the obvious approach]

Example Triggers

  • "Break down our parent communication problem from first principles"
  • "I want to rethink how we do [X] from the ground up"
  • "What are we assuming about [problem] that might be wrong?"

Integration

This skill compounds with:

  • inversion-strategist - After rebuilding from fundamentals, invert to find what would guarantee failure of the new approach
  • second-order-consequences - Project downstream effects of implementing the rebuilt solution
  • pre-mortem-analyst - Stress-test the rebuilt solution by imagining its failure
  • **six-thinking-ha...

Informations sur la source

Source
github
Repository
openclaw/skills
Path
skills/artyomx33/first-principles-decomposer
Version
—
Commit
10f8db5152852d46c7827467235c3d2bc56ec538
Source de classification
rules
Statut
active
Visibilité
public

Ces informations proviennent de l’analyse indexée et peuvent être anciennes. Vérifiez les fichiers actuels.

Contenu extrait

SKILL.md
# First Principles Decomposer

## When To Use
- Designing new products or features
- Feeling stuck on a complex problem
- Existing solutions seem overcomplicated
- Need to challenge assumptions
- Starting any new project or initiative

## The Process

### Phase 1: Identify Assumptions
Ask: "What am I assuming to be true that might not be?"
List every assumption embedded in the current approach.

### Phase 2: Break to Atoms
For each assumption, ask: "What is the most fundamental truth here?"
Keep asking "why?" until you hit bedrock facts.

### Phase 3: Rebuild From Truth
Starting ONLY from verified fundamentals, ask:
"What's the simplest solution that addresses the core need?"

## Interactive Flow

When user invokes this skill:

1. **Clarify the problem** (1-2 questions max)
2. **Surface assumptions** - list what's being taken for granted
3. **Decompose to fundamentals** - show the atomic truths
4. **Rebuild solution** - construct from ground up
5. **Compare** - show how this differs from conventional approach

## Output Format

```
PROBLEM: [stated problem]

ASSUMPTIONS IDENTIFIED:
1. [assumption] → Challenge: [why this might be wrong]
2. [assumption] → Challenge: [why this might be wrong]

FUNDAMENTAL TRUTHS:
• [bedrock fact 1]
• [bedrock fact 2]
• [bedrock fact 3]

REBUILT SOLUTION:
[New approach built only from fundamentals]

VS CONVENTIONAL:
[How this differs from the obvious approach]
```

## Example Triggers
- "Break down our parent communication problem from first principles"
- "I want to rethink how we do [X] from the ground up"
- "What are we assuming about [problem] that might be wrong?"

## Integration

This skill compounds with:
- **inversion-strategist** - After rebuilding from fundamentals, invert to find what would guarantee failure of the new approach
- **second-order-consequences** - Project downstream effects of implementing the rebuilt solution
- **pre-mortem-analyst** - Stress-test the rebuilt solution by imagining its failure
- **six-thinking-ha...

Skills associés

OpenClaw

captchas-openclaw

captchasco

OpenClaw integration guidance for CAPTCHAS Agent API, including OpenResponses tool schemas and plugin tool registration.

OpenClaw

Modelready

carol-gutianle

name: modelready description: Start using a local or Hugging Face model instantly, directly from chat. metadata: {"openclaw":{"requires":{"bins": "bash", "curl" }, "env": "URL" }}

OpenClaw

Ethereum History

cartoonitunes

Read-only factual data about historical Ethereum mainnet contracts. Use when the user asks about a specific contract address, early Ethereum contracts, deployment era, deployer, bytecode, decompiled code, or do...