results-interpreter
Analyze CSV data files and interpret figures to generate the Results section. Fifth step of writer workflow. Requires scope.md, data/ folder with CSVs, and figures/ folder with images.
Explorez les skills IA publiés de sxg et consultez leurs instructions source.
Skills indexés
9Étoiles des dépôts des skills indexés
0Forks du dépôt
0Moyenne des étoiles par skill indexé
0Les étoiles d’un dépôt peuvent se répéter entre ses skills.
Analyze CSV data files and interpret figures to generate the Results section. Fifth step of writer workflow. Requires scope.md, data/ folder with CSVs, and figures/ folder with images.
Analyze GitHub repository to extract methodology and generate the Methods section. Fourth step of writer workflow. Requires scope.md and cloned code/ repository.
Combine all draft sections into final manuscript, apply formatting constraints, and generate reference list. Final step of writer workflow. Requires academic reviewer approval and all drafts/*.md files.
Synthesize all accumulated notes and drafts to generate the Discussion and Abstract sections. Sixth step of writer workflow. Requires all notes/*.md files and drafts/introduction.md, methods.md, results.md.
Draft scientific research manuscripts from research data. Use when user wants to write a research paper, has a project folder with papers, data, figures, and a GitHub repository link. Orchestrates context-inges...
Scan project folder structure, validate organization, clone GitHub repository, and generate an inventory of available materials. First step of writer workflow. Use when starting a new manuscript project.
Conduct scoping conversation with user to define research question, key findings, and constraints. Generates scope.md that guides all subsequent steps. Second step of writer workflow. Requires inventory.md to e...
Process user-provided PDFs using isolated subagents, generate structured notes, synthesize findings, and draft the Introduction section. Third step of writer workflow. Requires scope.md.
Review and critique a scientific manuscript, identifying critical issues with detailed explanations and recommendations. Produces a structured review with accept/revise/reject recommendation.
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.