Rechercher

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

agent-development

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "add an agent", "write a subagent", "agent frontmatter", "when to use description", "agent examples", "agent tools", "agent colors", "autonomous agent", or needs guidance on agent structure, system prompts, triggering conditions, or agent development best practices for Claude Code plugins.

sjnims☆ 9 Étoiles du dépôt1 Forks du dépôt

Installation

Suivez les instructions du dépôt pour votre agent. Consultez les fichiers et dépendances avant l’installation.

Voir la source ↗Guides

Instructions

Agent Development for Claude Code Plugins

Overview

Agents are autonomous subprocesses that handle complex, multi-step tasks independently. Master agent structure, triggering conditions, and system prompt design to create powerful autonomous capabilities.

Key concepts:

  • Agents are FOR autonomous work, commands are FOR user-initiated actions
  • Markdown file format with YAML frontmatter
  • Triggering via description field with examples
  • System prompt defines agent behavior
  • Model and color customization

Important - Field Name Difference: Agents use tools to restrict tool access. Skills use allowed-tools for the same purpose. Don't confuse these when switching between component types.

Note on Official Documentation: The color field documented in this skill is supported by Claude Code and is generated by the built-in /agents command, but it is not yet reflected in the official sub-agents documentation. See anthropics/claude-code#8501 for tracking. The plugins-reference.md may show an older agent format using a capabilities field; for Claude Code plugins, prefer the structure documented in this skill which uses tools for tool restrictions.

Quick Start

Minimal working agent (copy-paste ready):

---
name: my-reviewer
description: Use this agent when the user asks to review code. Examples:

<example>
Context: User wrote new code
user: "Review my changes"
assistant: "I'll use the my-reviewer agent to analyze the code."
<commentary>
Code review request triggers the agent.
</commentary>
</example>

model: inherit
color: blue
---

You are a code reviewer. Analyze code for issues and provide feedback.

**Process:**

1. Read the code
2. Identify issues
3. Provide recommendations

**Output:** Summary with file:line references for each finding.

For complete format with all options, see Agent File Structure.

When to Use Agents vs Commands vs Skills

Component Best For Triggering Example Use Case
Agents Autonomous multi-step tasks Proactive or description-matched Code review after implementation
Commands User-initiated actions Explicit /command invocation /deploy production
Skills Knowledge and guidance Model-invoked based on context Domain expertise for PDF processing

See also: For command development, load the command-development skill. For skill development, load the skill-development skill.

Choose Agents When
  • Task requires autonomous, multi-step execution
  • Proactive triggering after certain events is desired
  • Specialized subprocess with focused tools needed
  • Work should happen in the background or as a subagent
Choose Commands When
  • User should explicitly trigger the action
  • Task has clear start/end with specific inputs
  • Action should not happen automatically
  • Workflow requires user confirmation at each step
Choose Skills When
  • Providing knowledge or procedural guidance
  • Extending Claude's domain expertise
  • No autonomous execution needed
  • Information should be available contextually on-demand

Agent File Structure

Complete Format
---
name: agent-identifier
description: Use this agent when [triggering conditions]. Examples:

<example>
Context: [Situation description]
user: "[User request]"
assistant: "[How assistant should respond and use this agent]"
<commentary>
[Why this agent should be triggered]
</commentary>
</example>

<example>
[Additional example...]
</example>

model: inherit
color: blue
tools: Read, Write, Grep
---

You are [agent role description]...

**Your Core Responsibilities:**

1. [Responsibility 1]
2. [Responsibility 2]

**Analysis Process:**
[Step-by-step workflow]

**Output Format:**
[What to return]

Frontmatter Fields

name (required)

Agent identifier used for namespacing and invocation.

Format: lowercase, numbers, hyphens only Length: 3-50 characters Pattern: Must start and end with alphanumeric

Good examples:

  • code-reviewer
  • test-generator
  • api-docs-writer
  • security-analyzer

Bad examples:

  • helper (too generic)
  • -agent- (starts/ends with hyphen)
  • my_agent (underscores not allowed)
  • ag (too short, < 3 chars)
description (required)

Defines when Claude should trigger this agent. This is the most critical field.

Must include:

  1. Triggering conditions ("Use this agent when...")
  2. Multiple <example> blocks showing usage
  3. Context, user request, and assistant response in each example
  4. <commentary> explaining why agent triggers

Format:

Use this agent when [conditions]. Examples:

<example>
Context: [Scenario description]
user: "[What user says]"
assistant: "[How Claude should respond]"
<commentary>
[Why this agent is appropriate]
</commentary>
</example>

[More examples...]

Best practices:

  • Include 2-4 concrete examples
  • Show proactive and reactive triggering
  • Cover different phrasings of same intent
  • Explain reasoning in commentary
  • Be specific about when NOT to use the agent
model (required)

Which model the agent should use.

Options:

  • inherit - Use same model as parent (recommended)
  • sonnet - Claude Sonnet (balanced)
  • opus - Claude Opus (most capable, expensive)
  • haiku - Claude Haiku (fast, cheap)

When to choose:

  • haiku - Fast, simple tasks; quick analysis; cost-sensitive operations
  • sonnet - Balanced performance; most use cases (default recommendation)
  • opus - Complex reasoning; detailed analysis; highest capability needed

Recommendation: Use inherit (recommended default) unless the agent specifically needs:

  • haiku for fast, cost-sensitive operations
  • opus for complex reasoning requiring maximum capability
color (required)

Visual identifier for agent in UI.

Note: This field is supported by Claude Code but not yet in official documentation. See the Overview note for details.

Options: blue, cyan, green, yellow, magenta, red

Guidelines:

  • Choose distinct colors for different agents in same plugin
  • Use consistent colors for similar agent types
  • Blue/cyan: Analysis, review
  • Green: Success-oriented tasks
  • Yellow: Caution, validation
  • Red: Critical, security
  • Magenta: Creative, generation
tools (optional)

Restrict agent to specific tools.

Format: Comma-separated tool names

tools: Read, Write, Grep, Bash

Default: If omitted, agent has access to all tools

Best practice: Limit tools to minimum needed (principle of least privilege)

Common tool sets:

  • Read-only analysis: Read, Grep, Glob
  • Code generation: Read, Write, Grep
  • Testing: Read, Bash, Grep
  • Full access: Omit field entirely

Important: Agents use tools while Skills use allowed-tools. The field names differ between component types. For skill tool restrictions, see the skill-development skill.

skills (optional)

Load specific skills into the agent's context:

skills:
  - testing-patterns
  - security-audit
  - api-design

Use cases:

  • Give agent domain expertise via skills
  • Combine multiple skills for comprehensive workflows
  • Share knowledge between agents and skills

Skills must be from the same plugin. The skill's SKILL.md content loads into the agent's context.

permissionMode (optional)

Control how the agent handles permission requests:

permissionMode: acceptEdits

Values:

  • acceptEdits - Auto-accept file edit operations (Write, Edit)
  • dontAsk - Skip permission dialogs for all operations
  • bypassPermissions - Full bypass (requires trust)
  • plan - Planning mode, propose changes without executing

Default: Standard permission model (asks user)

Security note: Use restrictive modes (plan, acceptEdits) for untrusted agents. bypassPermissions should only be used for fully trusted agents.

Fields NOT Available for Agents

Some frontmatter fields are specific to skills and do not apply to agents:

Skill-Only Field Purpose Why Not for Agents
context: fork Run skill in separate subagent context Agents already run as subprocesses by design
agent Specify agent type for forked context Only applies when context: fork is set
user-invocable Control slash menu visibility Agents aren't invoked via slash commands
disable-model-invocation Block programmatic Skill tool usage Agents use Task tool, not Skill tool
allowed-tools Restrict tool access (skill syntax) Agents use tools field instead (different field name)

Key distinction: Skills provide knowledge and guidance that loads into context. Agents are autonomous subprocesses that execute independently. This architectural difference explains why context-forking options don't apply to agents—they're already isolated processes.

System Prompt Design

The markdown body becomes the agent's system prompt. Write in second person, addressing the agent directly.

Key elements:

  • Role definition ("You are [role] specializing in [domain]")
  • Core responsibilities (numbered list)
  • Process steps (concrete, actionable)
  • Quality standards (measurable criteria)
  • Output format (specific structure)
  • Edge cases (how to handle exceptions)

Best practices:

  • Write in second person ("You are...", "You will...")
  • Be specific, not vague
  • Keep under 10,000 characters
  • Include concrete steps, not generic instructions

For detailed templates and patterns (Analysis, Generation, Validation, Orchestration agents), see references/system-prompt-design.md.

Creating Agents

Method 1: AI-Assisted Generation

Use this prompt pattern (extracted from Claude Code):

Create an agent configuration based on this request: "[YOUR DESCRIPTION]"

Requirements:
1. Extract core intent and responsibilities
2. Design expert persona for the domain
3. Create comprehensive system prompt with:
   - Clear behavioral boundaries
   - Specific methodologies
   - Edge case handling
   - Output format
4. Create identifier (lowercase, hyphens, 3-50 chars)
5. Write description with triggering conditions
6. Include 2-3 <example> blocks showing when to use

Return JSON with:
{
  "identifier": "agent-name",
  "whenToUse": "Use this agent when... Examples: <example>...</example>",
  "systemPrompt": "You are..."
}

Then convert to agent file format with frontmatter.

See examples/agent-creation-prompt.md for complete template.

Method 2: Manual Creation
  1. Choose agent identifier (3-50 chars, lowercase, hyphens)
  2. Write description with examples
  3. Select model (usually inherit)
  4. Choose color for visual identification
  5. Define tools (if restricting access)
  6. Write system prompt with structure above
  7. Save as agents/agent-name.md

Validation Rules

Identifier Validation
✅ Valid: code-reviewer, test-gen, api-analyzer-v2
❌ Invalid: ag (too short), -start (starts with hyphen), my_agent (underscore)

Rules:

  • 3-50 characters
  • Lowercase letters, numbers, hyphens only
  • Must start and end with alphanumeric
  • No underscores, spaces, or special characters
Description Validation

Length: 10-5,000 characters Must include: Triggering conditions and examples Best: 200-1,000 characters with 2-4 examples

System Prompt Validation

Length: 20-10,000 characters Best: 500-3,000 characters Structure: Clear responsibilities, process, output format

Agent Organization

Plugin Agents Directory
plugin-name/
└── agents/
    ├── analyzer.md
    ├── reviewer.md
    └── generator.md

All .md files in agents/ are auto-discovered.

Portable Paths

When referencing files within your plugin (scripts, references, etc.) from agent system prompts, use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} for portable paths:

Run the validation script at `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/validate.sh`

This variable resolves to the plugin's installation directory at runtime, ensuring paths work regardless of where the plugin is installed.

Namespacing

Agents are namespaced automatically:

  • Single plugin: agent-name
  • With subdirectories: plugin:subdir:agent-name

Testing Agents

Test Triggering

Create test scenarios to verify agent triggers correctly:

  1. Write agent with specific triggering examples
  2. Use similar phrasing to examples in test
  3. Check Claude loads the agent
  4. Verify agent provides expected functionality
Load Agents at Session Start

Use the --agents CLI flag to pre-load specific agents:

# Load single agent
claude --agents code-reviewer

# Load multiple agents
claude --agents "code-reviewer,test-generator"

Use cases:

  • Testing agent behavior without triggering
  • Workflows requiring specific agents
  • Debugging agent system prompts
Test System Prompt

Ensure system prompt is complete:

  1. Give agent typical task
  2. Check it follows process steps
  3. Verify output format is correct
  4. Test edge cases mentioned in prompt
  5. Confirm quality standards are met

Quick Reference

Frontmatter Fields Summary
Field Required Format Example
name Yes lowercase-hyphens code-reviewer
description Yes Text + examples Use when... ...
model Yes inherit/sonnet/opus/haiku inherit
color Yes Color name blue
tools No Comma-separated tool names Read, Grep
skills No Array of skill names [testing, security]
permissionMode No Permission mode string acceptEdits

Note: Agents use tools to restrict tool access. Skills use allowed-tools for the same purpose. The field names differ between component types.

Best Practices

DO:

  • ✅ Include 2-4 concrete examples in description
  • ✅ Write specific triggering conditions
  • ✅ Use inherit for model unless specific need
  • ✅ Choose appropriate tools (least privilege)
  • ✅ Write clear, structured system prompts
  • ✅ Test agent triggering thoroughly

DON'T:

  • ❌ Use generic descriptions without examples
  • ❌ Omit triggering conditions
  • ❌ Give all agents same color
  • ❌ Grant unnecessary tool access
  • ❌ Write vague system prompts
  • ❌ Skip testing

Additional Resources

Reference Files

For detailed guidance, consult:

  • references/system-prompt-design.md - Four system prompt patterns (Analysis, Generation, Validation, Orchestration) with complete templates and common pitfalls
  • references/triggering-examples.md - Example block anatomy, four example types, template library, and debugging guide
  • references/agent-creation-system-prompt.md - The exact prompt used by Claude Code's agent generation feature with usage patterns
Example Files

Working examples in examples/:

  • agent-creation-prompt.md - AI-assisted agent generation template
  • complete-agent-examples.md - Full agent examples for different use cases
Utility Scripts

Development tools in scripts/:

  • create-agent-skeleton.sh - Generate new agent file from template
  • validate-agent.sh - Validate agent file structure
  • test-agent-trigger.sh - Test if agent triggers correctly

Exemples

Consultez les exemples du dépôt source.

Voir la source ↗

Historique source

Date d’indexation
2026-01-20
Mise à jour de l’index
2026-02-05
Branch
main

Les dates concernent ce répertoire. Consultez le dépôt pour l’historique du code.

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!