vision
Create vision documents for features, products, or company direction. Use when starting something new.
Installation
Suivez les instructions du dépôt pour votre agent. Consultez les fichiers et dépendances avant l’installation.
Voir la source ↗GuidesInstructions
Vision
Create vision documents that anchor all subsequent work.
When to Use
- Starting a new product or feature
- Clarifying direction for an existing initiative
- Company-level strategic planning
- Any time clarity on "why" and "where" is needed
Dependencies
- None - this is the first stage in the flow
Book Triggers
Reference: [[books/product-innovation.md]]
- Apply "Inspired" vision principles
- Use "Escaping the Build Trap" outcome focus
Reference: [[books/startup-business.md]]
- Apply "Lean Startup" hypothesis framing
- Use "Rework" for simplicity and focus
Vision Scope Levels
Vision documents scale based on scope:
| Level | Scope | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Feature | Single capability | "Add dark mode" |
| Epic | Related feature set | "Improve accessibility" |
| Product | Entire product | "Mobile app launch" |
| Company | Organization direction | "Annual strategic plan" |
The same structure applies at all levels, with depth varying by scope.
Minimum Vision Requirements
Every vision document must answer:
- Where we are - Current state
- What the problem is - Even high level
- How painful it is - Qualify severity
- Where we want to go - End goal
- Some alternatives - Non-exhaustive options
- Constraints - The more complete, the better
Vision Document Template
# Vision: [Title]
## TLDR
[2-4 sentences: The problem, the direction, and why it matters now.]
## Current State
[Where are we today? What's working? What's not?]
## Problem
### What's Wrong
[The specific problem or opportunity]
### Why It Matters
[Impact on users, business, team]
### Severity
[How painful is this? Quantify if possible.]
## Desired Future State
[Where do we want to be? What does success look like?]
## Success Criteria
[How will we know we've succeeded?]
- [ ] [Measurable criterion 1]
- [ ] [Measurable criterion 2]
- [ ] [Measurable criterion 3]
## Alternatives Considered
### Option A: [Name]
- Description: [Brief explanation]
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
### Option B: [Name]
- Description: [Brief explanation]
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
### Recommendation
[Which option and why]
## Constraints
### Non-Negotiables
- [Must have / cannot change]
### Resources
- [Time, budget, people available]
### Technical
- [System limitations, dependencies]
### Business
- [Regulatory, contractual, strategic]
## Scope
**In Scope:**
- [What this vision covers]
**Out of Scope:**
- [What this vision explicitly excludes]
## Open Questions
- [Unresolved questions that need answers]
## Next Steps
- [ ] [Immediate next action]
- [ ] [Following action]
Discovery Process
Approach: Discovery, Not Checklist
Don't mechanically fill in a form. Instead:
-
Start with what's known
- What prompted this initiative?
- What's the pain or opportunity?
-
Discover gaps through questions
- What's unclear?
- What assumptions are being made?
- What would change the direction?
-
Ask the founder/stakeholder
- Surface questions naturally
- Capture answers in the appropriate section
Key Discovery Questions
Problem Discovery:
- "What triggered this now?"
- "Who experiences this problem?"
- "How are they solving it today?"
- "What happens if we don't address this?"
Success Discovery:
- "How would we know this succeeded?"
- "What would make this a failure?"
- "What's the minimum viable success?"
Constraint Discovery:
- "What can't change?"
- "What resources are available?"
- "When does this need to be done?"
- "What decisions do you want to make personally?"
Vision Quality Checklist
Before finalizing:
- TLDR captures essence in 2-4 sentences
- Problem is specific, not vague
- Severity is qualified (ideally quantified)
- Success criteria are measurable
- At least 2 alternatives considered
- Constraints are explicit
- Scope is clear (in and out)
- Open questions are surfaced
Output Location
projects/{project}/docs/vision.md
Or for company-level:
company/docs/vision.md
Integration
With product-development-flow.md
- Vision is the first stage
- All other stages depend on vision existing
- Vision document is referenced throughout
With project-kickoff.md
- Kickoff interview produces vision inputs
- Vision skill structures the outputs
With brainstorm.md
- Vision anchors brainstorming
- Brainstorm explores options within vision constraints
With prd.md
- PRD references vision for context
- PRD elaborates on chosen alternative
Anti-Patterns
- Solution masquerading as vision - Start with problem, not solution
- Vague success - "Make it better" isn't measurable
- Missing constraints - Constraints shape solutions
- Single option - Always consider alternatives
- Feature list - Vision is about outcomes, not features
- Skipping severity - Pain level affects priority
Exemples
Consultez les exemples du dépôt source.
Voir la source ↗Historique source
- Date d’indexation
- 2026-01-20
- Mise à jour de l’index
- 2026-01-26
- Branch
- main
Les dates concernent ce répertoire. Consultez le dépôt pour l’historique du code.
GitHub ↗chat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!