Rechercher

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

patterns-vertical-tdd

Structure implementation tasks using vertical slicing with TDD discipline. Use when creating task mappings, generating implementation tasks, or when you see "vertical slice", "TDD", "test first", "cycle structure", or "testable increment".

deepeshBodh☆ 16 Étoiles du dépôt1 Forks du dépôt

Installation

Suivez les instructions du dépôt pour votre agent. Consultez les fichiers et dépendances avant l’installation.

Voir la source ↗Guides

Instructions

Vertical Slicing with TDD

Purpose

Transform requirements into implementation tasks organized as vertical slices with strict TDD discipline. Each slice (called a "cycle") delivers observable, testable value and follows test-first principles.

Core Principles

1. Vertical Over Horizontal

Wrong (horizontal slicing):

Phase 1: All models
Phase 2: All services
Phase 3: All endpoints
Phase 4: All tests

Right (vertical slicing):

Cycle 1: User creation (model + service + endpoint + test)
Cycle 2: User authentication (model + service + endpoint + test)
Cycle 3: User profile management (model + service + endpoint + test)
2. Test-First at Task Level

Every cycle structures tasks so tests come before implementation:

Cycle N: [Feature]
├── Task N.1: Write failing test
├── Task N.2: Implement to pass
├── Task N.3: Refactor and verify
└── Task N.4: Demo and validate
3. Foundation + Parallel
Foundation Cycles (sequential)
├── C1: Core data model + basic CRUD
├── C2: Authentication framework
└── C3: API infrastructure

Feature Cycles (parallel-eligible)
├── C4: [P] Search functionality
├── C5: [P] Filtering
├── C6: [P] Export feature
└── C7: Notifications (depends on C4)
4. Layered Testability

Each cycle must be testable at multiple levels:

  • Automated tests: Unit, integration, and/or E2E tests
  • Demonstrable behavior: Observable by stakeholders
  • Contract verification: Meets acceptance criteria from spec

Identifying Vertical Slices

See SLICE-IDENTIFICATION.md for detailed heuristics on identifying good vertical slices from requirements.

Quick Heuristics

A good vertical slice:

  1. Delivers user value: Something a user could observe or use
  2. Touches all layers: Model, service, API, UI (as applicable)
  3. Is independently testable: Can verify it works without other slices
  4. Is sized appropriately: Completable in 1-3 implementation sessions
Slice Boundaries
Boundary Signal Action
Distinct user action New cycle
Different acceptance scenario May be new cycle or same cycle
Shared infrastructure need Foundation cycle
Optional enhancement Feature cycle (can parallelize)

Cycle Structure

See CYCLE-STRUCTURE.md for detailed cycle formatting and examples.

Standard Cycle Format
### Cycle N: [Vertical slice description]

> Stories: US-X, US-Y
> Dependencies: C1, C2 (or "None")
> Type: Foundation | Feature [P]

- [ ] **TN.1**: Write failing E2E test for [behavior] in tests/e2e/test_[name].py
- [ ] **TN.2**: Implement [component] to pass test in src/[path]/[file].py
- [ ] **TN.3**: Refactor and verify tests pass
- [ ] **TN.4**: Demo [behavior], verify acceptance criteria

**Checkpoint**: [What should be observable/testable after this cycle]
Task Numbering
  • Cycle 1 tasks: T1.1, T1.2, T1.3, T1.4
  • Cycle 2 tasks: T2.1, T2.2, T2.3, T2.4
  • etc.
Markers
Marker Meaning
[P] Parallel-eligible (no dependencies blocking)
[US#] Maps to user story number
[EXTEND] Extends existing file (brownfield)
[MODIFY] Modifies existing code (brownfield)

Foundation vs Feature Cycles

Foundation Cycles

Purpose: Establish infrastructure that ALL features depend on.

Characteristics:

  • Must complete before any feature cycle
  • Sequential (C1 before C2 before C3)
  • Typically includes: data models, auth, API framework, error handling

Identification: Ask "Could ANY user story start without this?" If no, it's foundation.

Feature Cycles

Purpose: Deliver user value incrementally.

Characteristics:

  • Can start once foundation is complete
  • Often parallel-eligible
  • Map directly to user stories
  • Independently testable

Identification: Ask "Does this deliver value a user could observe?" If yes, it's a feature.

TDD Task Sequence

Each cycle follows the red-green-refactor pattern:

Task 1: Write Failing Test (Red)
- [ ] **TN.1**: Write failing E2E test for [user action produces result] in tests/e2e/test_[feature].py

The test should:

  • Express the acceptance criteria
  • Be specific about expected behavior
  • FAIL when run (nothing implemented yet)
Task 2: Implement to Pass (Green)
- [ ] **TN.2**: Implement [component] to pass test in src/[path]/[file].py

Implementation should:

  • Make the test pass
  • Be minimal (just enough to pass)
  • Include all necessary layers (model, service, endpoint)
Task 3: Refactor and Verify
- [ ] **TN.3**: Refactor and verify tests pass

Refactoring should:

  • Improve code quality without changing behavior
  • Ensure all tests still pass
  • Address any code review concerns
Task 4: Demo and Validate
- [ ] **TN.4**: Demo [behavior], verify acceptance criteria

Validation should:

  • Demonstrate the feature to stakeholders (if applicable)
  • Verify against spec acceptance criteria
  • Confirm the slice is "done"

Mapping Stories to Cycles

Simple Case: Story = Cycle

When a user story is well-scoped, it becomes one cycle:

US-1: As a user, I can create a task with a title
  → Cycle 1: Task creation
Split Case: Story > Cycle

When a story is too large, split into multiple cycles:

US-2: As a user, I can manage my tasks (create, edit, delete, complete)
  → Cycle 2: Task creation (foundation)
  → Cycle 3: Task editing
  → Cycle 4: Task deletion
  → Cycle 5: Task completion
Merge Case: Stories < Cycle

When stories are too small, merge into one cycle:

US-3: As a user, I can see task count
US-4: As a user, I can see completed count
  → Cycle 6: Task statistics (covers US-3 and US-4)

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing task mapping or task list:

  • Every P1/P2 story maps to at least one cycle
  • Cycles are vertical slices (not horizontal layers)
  • Foundation cycles identified and sequenced
  • Feature cycles marked [P] where appropriate
  • Each cycle has TDD structure (test first)
  • Every task has specific file path
  • Dependencies are minimal and explicit
  • Cycles are independently testable

Exemples

Consultez les exemples du dépôt source.

Voir la source ↗

Historique source

Date d’indexation
2026-01-20
Mise à jour de l’index
2026-02-04
Branch
main

Les dates concernent ce répertoire. Consultez le dépôt pour l’historique du code.

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!