tdd-workflow
Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.
Découvrez les skills tools code quality, comparez leurs dépôts et consultez leurs instructions.
Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.
[61] VALIDATE. Comprehensive code quality check combining ESLint, TypeScript compilation, and unused code detection. Runs full lint suite with detailed error reporting and fix suggestions. Use before commits, a...
Review code for best practices, bugs, and security issues. Use when the user asks to review code, check for problems, or analyze code quality.
Audit if CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md follow best practices from humanlayer.dev blog. Use when (1) user wants to validate their documentation structure, (2) user invokes /audit-claude-md command, (3) user asks to au...
Enforces consistent design tokens, patterns, and component styles. Use when building new components, reviewing UI consistency, or extracting patterns from existing code.
Audits UI code for accessibility, performance, and UX compliance. Use when reviewing components, checking accessibility, or validating UI before shipping.
Use proactively to ensure code quality through reviews and testing. This is particularly important after code generation or changes.
Audit and map a codebase to understand structure, dependencies, and risks. Use when the user asks to audit a repo, understand architecture, or assess codebase quality or health.
Best practices for TypeScript types, interfaces, assertions, and type safety. Use when writing or reviewing TypeScript code.
Review code changes and remove AI-generated patterns like excessive comments, gratuitous defensive checks, type escape hatches, and over-engineering.
コード品質レビュー - アーキテクチャ、コード臭、パフォーマンス、型安全性を統合評価
Review current project against mature patterns and standards. Triggers include "review this project", "what am I missing", "align with standards", "check tool usage", or when starting in an unfamiliar project.
Detect and resolve incoherence in documentation, code, specs vs implementation. Includes reconciliation phase for applying user-provided resolutions.
코드 리뷰 체크리스트를 적용하는 PR 검토 스킬
Detect and resolve incoherence in documentation, code, specs vs implementation. Includes reconciliation phase for applying user-provided resolutions.
Reviews code changes against Zenable conformance requirements using hybrid LLM-as-judge and deterministic validation. Automatically invoked when making code changes or at development milestones. Use for securit...
Audit SCSS/CSS for hardcoded values and suggest design tokens
Opinionated constraints for writing effective tests. Guide unit tests, integration tests, and E2E tests with quality metrics beyond coverage. Use when users write tests, review test code, or need testing strate...
Opinionated constraints for writing maintainable, testable code. Apply MTE principles, avoid over-engineering, guide refactoring, and provide code review checklists. Use when users write code, refactor, or need...
Systematic refactoring skill with test coverage requirements. Supports scope analysis, test-first refactoring, and integration with DevDocs workflow. Use when users need to refactor code, improve code quality,...
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
全面代码审查,检查安全漏洞、代码质量和最佳实践。 使用场景: - "code review" / "代码审查" / "审查代码" / "review 一下" - "检查代码质量" / "代码有什么问题" - "安全审查" / "找漏洞"
Provides SVC naming conventions, comment style, code structure order, and reset patterns. Triggers when writing or modifying any .sv file.
Testing guidance for this repo (unit, component, integration, and E2E). Includes troubleshooting.
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.