lint-format-and-type-check
Automated code quality enforcement through linting, formatting, and type checking to maintain consistent, error-free codebases.
Découvrez les skills tools code quality, comparez leurs dépôts et consultez leurs instructions.
Automated code quality enforcement through linting, formatting, and type checking to maintain consistent, error-free codebases.
Policy สำหรับ enforce code quality ผ่าน linting, testing, และ type checking ใน CI pipeline
Dart static analysis and linting for aviation-grade code quality. Use when configuring analysis_options.yaml, enforcing strict type safety, creating custom lint rules, or setting up code metrics for Flutter pro...
Conduct thorough code reviews focusing on code quality, security, best practices, and project standards. Use when asked to review code or PRs.
Detects duplicate implementations, SSoT violations, and banned patterns. Use before any code change that adds new logic, config, or constants.
Detects duplicate implementations, SSoT violations, and banned patterns. Use before any code change that adds new logic, config, or constants.
Review workscript node implementations for alignment with NODE_DEVELOPMENT_BLUEPRINT.md and consistency with the new-node skill. Use when reviewing node code, auditing node implementations, checking for complia...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "request code review", "prepare for PR review", "code review checklist", "pre-review validation", "review preparation", or needs guidance on preparing code for pe...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify the implementation", "check before finishing", "quality gates", "pre-completion validation", "verify before deploy", or needs comprehensive quality valida...
通过 Codex MCP 工具进行代码审查、算法设计、架构分析和性能优化。适用于复杂技术任务(>10行核心逻辑)、系统级设计、多约束权衡、性能瓶颈分析。触发词:review、code review、代码审查、算法设计、复杂算法、架构分析、架...
Comprehensive code review and health check. Use when user needs project audit, code quality check, conflict detection, or says "review code", "check project", "audit codebase", "health check", "find issues", "c...
Reviews code changes for bugs, style issues, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs or checking code quality.
変更されたコードの品質をレビューし、問題点や改善提案を報告します。PR作成前のセルフレビュー、コーディング規約のチェック、セキュリティリスクの検出に使用してください。
Analyze test coverage requirements and assess whether code meets testing standards. Use when reviewing test plans, evaluating test coverage, or assessing testing quality.
Review production code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and maintainability. Use when reviewing pull requests, code changes, or assessing code quality.
Repo-scoped skill for deterministic CI autofix without PR comments
Run the complete code review pipeline on recent changes. Launches three review agents in parallel to check code quality, error handling, and simplification opportunities.
Define canonical dotnet format and analyzer verification commands, and provide scripts that generate a format/analyzer report. Use when checking formatting or Roslyn analyzers without reformatting everything.
Comprehensive multi-AI code review system for Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript. Use when reviewing code for quality, security, performance, or best practices. Includes automated analysis scripts, language-spe...
Multi-language code formatting and style enforcement with automatic linting fixes
Detects code/documentation drift, validates examples, generates diagrams, auto-updates documentation
Delegates code review to OpenAI Codex CLI. Use when user says "코드 리뷰해줘", "Codex한테 리뷰 맡겨", "PR 검토해줘", "코드 품질 체크", "리팩토링 제안해줘", "second opinion", or asks for code review, refactoring...
Self-review loop for code changes. Use when Codex edits files or prepares a PR and should run `codex exec --sandbox workspace-write review --base BASE`, fix findings, and re-run until clean (max 10). Also run t...
Detect spaghetti code and propose specific refactoring solutions. Analyzes detected issues and provides concrete code improvements.
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.