code-quality-review
Guide for reviewing code quality, identifying issues, and suggesting improvements. Use when asked to review code, check for best practices, or conduct code reviews.
Découvrez les skills development automation tools, comparez leurs dépôts et consultez leurs instructions.
Guide for reviewing code quality, identifying issues, and suggesting improvements. Use when asked to review code, check for best practices, or conduct code reviews.
Perform systematic self-review of code changes before commits using structured checklist. Validates architecture boundaries, code quality, test coverage, documentation, and project-specific anti-patterns. Use b...
Validate and optimize CLAUDE.md files using Anthropic's best practices for focused sessions. Detects contradictions, redundancy, excessive length (200+ lines), emphasis overuse (2%+ density), broken links, and...
Perform concise, high-quality code reviews focused on hygiene, simplicity, maintainability, documentation, correctness, performance, security, and robustness. Use when reviewing PRs/diffs/files to surface risks...
Safe-by-default git workflow and Conventional Commits. Triggers on git operations, reviewing diffs, staging files, creating commits, or branch changes. Prevents destructive operations without consent.
Senior developer code review skill. Use when reviewing code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Triggers on code changes, PR reviews, or explicit review requests.
Review implementation quality and regression risks via claude-delegator (Code Reviewer expert). Use after implementation for complex tasks, refactors, or API changes.
Review uncommitted code changes against project standards. Similar to /review-code but scoped to changed files only. Suggests fixes and in auto-edit mode fixes automatically.
Run an interactive codebase audit to analyze project structure, detect issues, and generate improvement PRDs. Use when you want to understand a codebase, find technical debt, or plan improvements. Triggers on:...
Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.
Best practices for making safe, verified code edits
Enforces "Feature-First" architecture across standard frameworks. Use to scaffold new projects, refactor messy ones, or enforce clean file organization rules.
Finds all REFACTOR markers in codebase, validates associated ADRs exist, identifies stale markers (30+ days old), and detects orphaned markers (no ADR). Use during status checks, before feature completion, or f...
Activate Code Reviewer mode for code review and quality assurance. Use when reviewing code for bugs, security issues, or optimization opportunities.
コード品質の専門家。品質・セキュリティ・パフォーマンスの観点からコードをレビュー。使用場面: (1) コードレビュー、(2) バグ発見、(3) パフォーマンス改善提案、(4) セキュリティ脆弱性チェック、(5) ベストプラクティス適...
Perform comprehensive frontend code reviews for JavaScript, TypeScript, React, Vue, Angular, and other frontend frameworks. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests, auditing existing codebases, or providing...
Optimizes multi-file refactoring workflows by enforcing token-efficient MultiEdit usage (30-50% savings), coordinating changes across files, validating imports/references, and running quality gates. Use when re...
Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis procedures. Use after every code modification to ensure syntax correctness and project standards. Triggers onKeywords: lint, format, check, validate, type...
Review the entire codebase based on project structure, code guidelines, and standards. Suggests fixes and in auto-edit mode fixes automatically. Does not review content - use /review-all for content.
OpenAI Codex CLIを使用したコードレビュー、分析、コードベースへの質問を実行する。使用場面: (1) コードレビュー依頼時、(2) コードベース全体の分析、(3) 実装に関する質問、(4) バグの調査、(5) リファクタリング提案、(6...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review TypeScript code", "check my TS code", "review this TypeScript", "write TypeScript", or when writing, reviewing, or refactoring TypeScript code in projects...
Use this agent when you need to fix linting errors, ensure code quality compliance, or resolve conflicts between multiple linting tools. Examples:
Review code changes for best practices, potential bugs, security issues, and style consistency. Use when asked to review code, check changes, or before committing.
Applies Sun Lab Python coding conventions when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code. Covers .py files, docstrings, type annotations, naming conventions, README.md files, git commit messages, and Claude skill...
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.