code-quality-review
Enforce code standards, validate against project patterns, review code quality, and maintain consistent TypeScript strict mode compliance across all components
Découvrez les skills databases code quality, comparez leurs dépôts et consultez leurs instructions.
Enforce code standards, validate against project patterns, review code quality, and maintain consistent TypeScript strict mode compliance across all components
Code reviewer focusing on correctness, regressions, security, and test coverage - P0/P1/P2 severity
Validates research/plan/code against overengineering, underengineering, and hallucination
Analyze codebases to find patterns and anti-patterns, identify code duplication, suggest optimizations, analyze dependencies, and perform automated code reviews
React and React Native coding conventions with TypeScript. Use this skill when creating components, writing hooks, or reviewing React/React Native code. Enforces naming conventions, component structure, typing...
SOLID principles for TypeScript code review and refactoring. Use when reviewing code architecture, detecting design violations, refactoring classes/modules/hooks, or improving code maintainability. Covers SRP,...
This skill should be used when the user wants to run code quality checks (linting, formatting, type checking, tests) on the lazyopencode project. Use this skill when asked to "run quality gates", "check the cod...
Create AST-based checks for evaluating generated Python code quality
Review Python code ensuring strict type safety with Python 3.12+ conventions. Use when reviewing Python code, writing new Python code, or refactoring existing Python code.
Review Python code for adherence to SOLID principles (SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP). Use when reviewing Python code for maintainability, testability, and design quality.
Expert guidance for vibe-validate, an LLM-optimized validation orchestration tool. Use when working with vibe-validate commands, configuration, pre-commit workflows, or validation orchestration in TypeScript pr...
Process external code review feedback systematically. Use when responding to PR comments, review feedback, or technical suggestions from reviewers.
Use when reviewing code quality, before refactoring, when complexity increases, when code feels "hard to change", during code review, or when onboarding to unfamiliar code - systematic identification of code sm...
Automatically invoked when analyzing code quality, refactoring, or maintainability. Triggers on mentions of "code smell", "refactor", "code quality", "technical debt", "complexity", "maintainability", "clean co...
AI agent handles code review feedback professionally by categorizing, responding appropriately, and extracting learnings. Use when PR feedback arrives, addressing reviewer comments, or improving from feedback.
AI agent identifies and fixes common testing anti-patterns that lead to flaky, slow, or unmaintainable test suites. Use when reviewing tests, debugging test failures, or improving test quality.
Enforce project hygiene throughout the PR lifecycle. Use before creating PRs to validate worktrees, branch naming, and issue linking. Use when creating PRs to ensure proper "Fixes
Run multiple linters (eslint, oxlint, tsc, biome) in parallel with unified JSON output. Use when linting code, checking for errors before commits, or debugging lint failures. Triggers on "lint", "check code", "...
Review code for quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices compliance
Python type hints, type checking, and static analysis with mypy
Process and resolve GitHub Copilot automated PR review comments. Use when the user says "check copilot review", "handle copilot comments", "resolve copilot feedback", "address copilot suggestions", or mentions...
Use when writing Rails models - enforces state-as-records not booleans, concerns as adjectives namespaced under model, invocation ordering, and private indentation
Obsidian 플러그인 코드가 공식 가이드라인을 준수하는지 검토하고 개선점을 제안한다. Use when: - 사용자가 Obsidian 플러그인 가이드라인 준수 여부를 확인하고 싶을 때 - 플러그인을 커뮤니티 스토어에 제출하기 전 검토...
Review code for quality, style, and potential issues. Use when code has been written or modified, when user asks for code review, or when TDD autonomous mode needs quality assessment. Supports configurable stri...
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.